Relationship of intelligence and creativity in gifted and non-gifted students: An investigation of threshold theory

By F. Preckel, Heinz Holling, Michael Wiese. 2006

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Creativity and Intelligence Revisited: A Latent Variable Analysis of Wallach and Kogan (1965) (2008, background): “Recent research (Preckel et al., 2006; Sligh, Conners, & Roskos-Ewoldsen, 2005) and Kim’s (2005) meta-analysis, however, have found no support for a nonlinear relationship. model.”
Is creativity without intelligence possible? A Necessary Condition Analysis (2016, background): “The third rule (called C) confirms the TH when the relationship between intelligence and creativity in the group below the threshold is statistically significant and significantly stronger than above the threshold (Kim, 2005; Preckel et al., 2006).”
A snapshot of creativity: Evaluating a quick and simple method for assessing divergent thinking (2009, background): “Many contemporary researchers, in fact, use only the fluency scores as markers of creativity (e.g., Batey et al., 2009 and Preckel et al., 2006).”
Consequences of Beliefs about the Malleability of Creativity (2013, result): “Consistent with the domain-specific findings on creativity and intelligence (Cropley, 2006; Preckel et al., 2006; Runco, 1984; Sternberg, 1985) and between malleability beliefs of various attributes (Dweck et al., 1995; Levy et al., 1998; Tamir et al., 2007), the Study 3 creativity primes should…”