Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1

By Ann Majchrzak, Ronald E. Rice, Arvind Malhotra, N. King, Sulin Ba. 2000

784 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7553eef567c91bdd260de04bc598ef115e347d36

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Information Systems and Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Impact of Knowledge Coordination on Virtual Team Performance Over Time (2007, background): “…Leidner 1998), culture (Jarvenpaa, Knoll, and Leidner 1998; Massey et al. 2001), conflict (Massey et al. 2001), and the appropriation of communication technology (Majchrzak et al. 2000) are among a few of the factors that have been identified as drivers of the success and failure of virtual teams.”
I’m Proud of It: Consumer Technology Appropriation and Psychological Ownership (2015, neutral): “While technology appropriation has been studied extensively in organizational (Majchrzak et al., 2000) and group contexts (Chin, Gopal, and Salisbury, 1997), it has only recently been conceptualized at the individual level (Gaskin and Lyytinen, 2012).”
Sensemaking and Sustainable Practicing: Functional Affordances of Information Systems in Green Transformations (2013, background): “Single case studies are well-accepted in the IS literature (e.g., Davidson and Chismar 2007; Levina and Ross 2003; Majchrzak et al. 2000; Sarker et al. 2012; Silva and Hirschheim 2007; Vlaar et al. 2008), because they allow researchers to develop a deep understanding of information systems in use…”
Virtual teams: team control structure, work processes, and team effectiveness (2004, background): “Similarly, the team can decide to appropriate the technology as expected, but adapt the team structure and the organizational environment to correct misalignments (Majchrzak et al., 2000).”
Challenges in Conducting Empirical Work Using Structuration Theory: Learning from IT Research (2005, background): “We identified ten studies that had used this modality of bracketing: Barley (1990a), Majchrzak et al. (2000), Ngwenyama (1998), Orlikowski (1991 1992 1993 1996), Orlikowski and Yates (1994), Orlikowski et al. (1995), and Yates and Orlikowski (1992).”
From Use to Effective Use: A Representation Theory Perspective (2013, background): “Although past research (especially qualitative research) has shown the importance of adaptation and learning (Majchrzak et al. 2000; Boudreau and Seligman 2005; Barki et al. 2007), our contribution lies in the analysis of specific dimensions.”
Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing (2008, background): “…a number of other researchers have begun to argue that when misalignments surface between the functionality of an existing technology and users’ needs, people often physically adapt the technologies with which they work (Majchrzak et al., 2000; Markus, 2004; Pollock, 2005; Tyre & Orlikowski, 1994).”
Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity (2008, background): “Appropriation is also influenced by other factors (Majchrzak et al. 2000).”