The role of student characteristics in studying micro teaching–learning environments
By Tina Seidel. 2007
143 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/74d58f2cbd0ebeed7f36c334f237cf633be43e06
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Doris Holzberger
- K. Schnitzler
- Kathleen Stürmer
- Christian Kosel
- J. V. van Merriënboer
- Tina Seidel
- Saskia Brand-Gruwel
- Karen D. Könings
Citations in the corpus
- Differences between students’ and teachers’ perceptions of education: profiles to describe congruence and friction (2013, background): “Theoreti-cally, this study implies that studying global differences in more detail by identifying homogenous subgroups is of high added value (cf. Shavelson and Seidel 2006).”
- Student Characteristics in the Eyes of Teachers: Differences Between Novice and Expert Teachers in Judgment Accuracy, Observed Behavioral Cues, and Gaze (2020, methodology): “Finally, the fifth identified profile of uninterested students showed a rather negative engagement pattern, with reports of experiencing amotivation and no relevance in learning (Seidel 2006).”