A Reliability and Validity Study of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills—Modified

By Jacquelyn Elliott, S. Lee, N. Tollefson. 2001

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/734494fc81ec81e156a3bb3496abe1042dd4d1b6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Richard I. Parker
2. Mack D. Burke
3. Christopher H. Skinner
4. Oi-man Kwok
5. J. Fantuzzo
6. Heather L. Rouse
7. Kimberly J. Vannest
8. Andreas Lenz

In Education

1. Heather L. Rouse
2. J. Fearrington
3. J. Below
4. Shanna Hagan-Burke
5. Christopher H. Skinner
6. Richard I. Parker
7. Oi-man Kwok
8. C. A. Sorrell

Citations in the corpus

• Predictive Validity of Early Literacy Indicators From the Middle of Kindergarten to Second Grade (2009, methodology): “Testretest reliability for phoneme segmentation fluency is .85 (Elliott et al., 2001).”
• Validity of the Dynamic Indicators for Basic Early Literacy Skills as an Indicator of Early Literacy for Urban Kindergarten Children (2006, background): “Previous research has demonstrated concurrent validity in kindergarten using overall reading ability assessments or specific measures of phonological awareness (Elliott et al., 2001; Hintze et al., 2003).”
• Gender Differences in Early Literacy: Analysis of Kindergarten through Fifth-Grade Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills Probes (2010, background): “Elliott, Lee, and Tollefson (2001) examined the technical adequacy of the ISF, LNF, and PSF measures and found inter-rater reliabilities of .89, .94, and .97; test–retest reliabilities of .74, .90, and .85; and equivalent forms reliabilities of .64, .80, and .85, respectively.”