The Validity of a Response-to-Instruction Paradigm to Identify Reading Disabilities: A Longitudinal Analysis of Individual Differences and Contextual Factors

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

From IDEA to Implementation: A Discussion of Foundational and Future Responsiveness–to–Intervention Research (2007, methodology): “Case et al. (2003) provide a modiﬁed application of the PSM in their investigation of the treatment validity model, a four tiered RTI construct (see Fuchs & Fuchs, 1998, for extended discussion of the treatment validity model).”
Identifying Students at Risk, Monitoring Performance, and Determining Eligibility Within Response to Intervention: Research on Educational Need and Benefit From Academic Intervention (2007, background): “In the Peterson and Shinn (2002) study, when the criterion for a severe achievement discrepancy was severe discrepancy deviations from typical levels of achievement from students from the same community, nearly all students identified as SLD (85–95%) from both communities met this standard. This typ”
Responding to Nonresponders: An Experimental Field Trial of Identification and Intervention Methods (2005, methodology): “O’Connor (2000) and Case et al. (in press) have done precisely this.”
A Multi-Year Evaluation of the Effects of a Response to Intervention (RTI) Model on Identification of Children for Special Education. (2007, methodology): “Will RTI operate primarily in general education (Case et al., 2003) or somewhere in between general and special education, for example, in tracking supplemental services provided to at-risk students (Vaughn et al., 2003)?”