Test of Phonological Awareness

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Simple View of Reading: Assessment and Intervention (2006, unknown): “…such as the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP; Torgesen, Wagner, & Rashotte, 1999), the Test of Phonological Awareness (TOPA; Torgesen & Bryant, 1994), the Lindamood Auditory Conceptualization Test (LAC-3; Lindamood & Lindamood, 2004), and subtests of the Woodcock Diagnostic…”
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an Early Literacy Program for Students with Significant Developmental Disabilities (2008, methodology): “We generated items for NVLA based on the five components of reading proposed by NRP (2000) and by reviewing how these skills were measured in available literacy measures using verbal responses (e.g., DIBELS; Good & Kaminski, 2002; TOPA-2+; Torgesen & Bryant, 2004; TERA-3; Reid et al., 2001).”
On the Irrelevance of Intelligence in Predicting Responsiveness to Reading Instruction (2006, methodology): “They also scored in the bottom quartile on Woodcock Reading Mastery TestsRevised (WRMT-R; Woodcock, 1987) Word Identification, Word Attack, and Passage Comprehension, as well as in the bottom quartile on the Test of Phonological Awareness.”