Affective influences on attitudes and judgments.

By Joseph P. Forgas. 2003

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6fef6c0057d6f4ee28b9b19763178d54a4c42ce7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Excluded emotions: The role of anger in antisocial responses to ostracism (2008, background): “We also contrasted the effects of anger with another negative emotion, sadness, which is often considered a prototypic negative emotion (Feldman Barrett & Russell, 1998; Forgas, 2003; Russell & Carroll, 1999), to highlight the effects of anger on antisocial responses.”
Seeking Information About Sexual Health: Applying the Theory of Motivated Information Management (2006, background): “Studies have shown that affect colors outcome expectancies, efficacy assessments, and ultimately behavioral decisions (for review, see Forgas, 2003).”
Legitimacy‐as‐Feeling: How Affect Leads to Vertical Legitimacy Spillovers in Transnational Governance (2014, unknown): “…negative stimulus (e.g. unfavorable media coverage as the foundation of an external affect heuristic) weaken that intuiter’s positive affective response, or does it consolidate an earlier affective response because the intuiter disregards dissonant evidence (Forgas, 2003; Ito and Cacioppo, 2005)?”
Getting to the core of core self‐evaluation: a review and recommendations (2008, unknown): “strategies that are used to form judgments (Forgas, 2005).”
Feelings and Consumer Decision Making: Extending the Appraisal-Tendency Framework (2007, background): “For example, in his authoritative chapter in the handbook of affective sciences, Forgas concluded that “…most of the research suggests a fundamental affect-congruent pattern: positive affect improves, and negative affect impairs, the value of self conceptions” (Forgas, 2003, p. 602).”
Brain basis of human social interaction: from concepts to brain imaging. (2009, background): “Emotions form the omnipresent background for behavior and attitudes, and they serve as the primus motor of social interaction (65).”
Motivationally selective risk judgments: Do fear and curiosity boost the boons or the banes? (2007, background): “In recent years, theories of judgment and decisionmaking have placed increasing emphasis on the role of motivation and aVect (Forgas, 1995, 2003; Loewenstein & Lerner, 2003; Loewenstein, Weber, Hsee, & Welch, 2001; Schwarz & Clore, 1996; Zajonc, 1998).”
Preliminary evidence of diurnal rhythms in everyday behaviors associated with positive affect (2008, methodology): “…way humans recall autobiographic memories (Miranda & Kihlstrom, 2005), make decisions (Loewenstein & Lerner, 2003), resist or fall prey to persuasion (Schwarz & Clore, 2007), perceive and are perceived by others (Forgas, 2003), and influence how people respond to social situations (Zajonc, 2000).”
A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. (2003, background): “There is a clear need for more research in this area with academic tasks and careful attention to the nature of the tasks and the different kinds of cognitive processing or learning activities that are required (Forgas, 2003; Linnenbrink & Pintrich, 2002).”
Emotional Policy: Personal Sadness and Anger Shape Judgments about a Welfare Case (2008, background): “, mood congruent) feelings toward potential recipients (Bower, 1981; Fiedler, 1990; Forgas, 2003; Johnson & Tversky, 1983).”
Portrait of The Angry Decision Maker: How Appraisal Tendencies Shape Anger's Influence on Cognition. (2006, background): “For over two decades research has supported the intuition that being in a globally negative mood can lead one to form relatively pessimistic expectations, whereas being in a globally positive mood can lead one to form relatively optimistic expectations (for a review, see Forgas, 2003).”
Different Strokes for Different Folks: Entrepreneurial Narratives of Emotion, Cognition, and Making Sense of Business Failure (2015, background): “For example, negative emotions prompt an adaptive response to improve an aversive state, which triggers vigilant and effortful processing (Clark & Isen, 1982; Forgas, 2003; Isen, 1984; Isen, 1987).”