Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0
By John Seely Brown, Richard P. Adler. 2008
1,115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6bfb5eb082f3b10bab1ba7aeb44d9401183a4334
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Velda McCune
- Patrick Jermann
- Pierre Dillenbourg
- N. Entwistle
- Maria Ranieri
- Stefania Manca
- Idoia Elola
- Catherine McLoughlin
Citations in the corpus
- Students' perceptions of Facebook for academic purposes (2014, background): “According to Brown and Adler (2008), Internet has promoted a culture of content sharing that has been instrumental in the development of social learning. While theWeb 1.0 vastly expanded access to information, theWeb 2.0 provides new kinds of online resources (social network sites, blogs, wikis, fol”
- Personalised and Self Regulated Learning in the Web 2.0 Era: International Exemplars of Innovative Pedagogy Using Social Software. (2010, background): “…a need to reconsider our notions of pedagogy so that learners are envisaged as active participants and co-producers of learning resources rather than passive consumers of content, and learning processes are participatory and social, supportive of personal life goals and needs (Brown & Adler, 2008).”
- Teaching Strategies for the Net Generation (2009, background): “the traditional, talking-head, ―sage on the stage,‖ or broadcaster (transmitter of information) (Tapscott, 2009) in front of the classroom has shifted to group facilitator, orchestrator of collaborative knowledge creation (Brown, 2008), or ―guide on the side‖ (Carlson, 2005).”
- Facebook and the others. Potentials and obstacles of Social Media for teaching in higher education (2016, background): “Considering the academic context, some authors (e.g. Brown & Adler, 2008) have underlined that the adoption of these devices generates or requires a radical change of the pedagogical paradigm with ‘revolutionary’ consequences for academic institutions, or, at least, to reconsider teachers'…”
- Collaborative writing: fostering foreign language and writing conventions development (2010, methodology): “…learners into critical users who understand how the application of technological tools can transform the learning environment (Blake, 2008), and (c) highlight the importance of seeing collaborative work as a practice that can be relevant to learners' future professional lives (Brown & Adler, 2008).”
- Fostering Integrative Knowledge Through ePortfolios (2011, background): “…organizations and accrediting institutions in numerous professional fields (e.g. Engineering, Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing, and Social Work) have defined learning outcomes for educating lifelong learners capable of reflective, integrative and evidence-based practices (Seeley-Brown & Adler, 2008).”
- Technology for Classroom Orchestration (2010, background): “Authors such as Resnick (2002) or Brown and Adler (2008) use the word ecosystem to refer to the global learning space outside the school, namely the digital sphere.”
- Cultivating the Disposition to Understand in 21st Century University Education. (2011, background): “[...] (McCune, 2009: 355) Brown and Adler (2008) offer a range of examples of how Web 2.0 technologies may enable authentic learning experiences, which would previously have been impractical.”
- Open badges for education: what are the implications at the intersection of open systems and badging? (2014, background): “…availability of OERs can be linked to positive and new ways to deliver education such as individuals creating and joining their own, interest-driven, niche learning experiences (Seely Brown and Adler 2008) or lowering the cost of higher education for the masses (Wiley, Green, and Soares 2012).”
- Social Learning Analytics (2012, background): “It is succinctly expressed by Seely Brown and Adler (2008) as being " based on the premise that our understanding of content is socially constructed through conversations about that content and through grounded interactions, especially with others, around problems or actions.”