Using Concept Maps To Reveal Understanding: A Two-Tier Analysis

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparison of Two Concept-Mapping Techniques: Implications for Scoring, Interpretation, and Use. (2005, background): “…(1996) raised questions about the reliability and validity of concept maps as assessment tools that have been explored by recent research (e.g., Kinchin, 2000; Klein, Chung, Osmundson, Herl, & O’Neil, 2001; McClure, Sonak, & Suen, 1999; Nicoll, Francisco, & Nakhleh, 2001; Ruiz-Primo, Schultz,…”
Concept Mapping to Reveal Prior Knowledge and Conceptual Change in a Mock Summit Course on Global Climate Change (2005, methodology): “Although we were not interested in 'grading' the concept maps, we based our evaluation on a combination of scoring methods that have proven effective in other studies (Kinchin, 2000; McClure, Sonak and Suen, 1999; Nicoll, Francisco and Nakhleh, 2001; Novak and Gowin, 1984).”
If concept mapping is so helpful to learning biology, why aren't we all doing it? (2001, methodology): “Introduction Concept mapping is an active learning tool with numerous uses in the biology classroom, including planning, teaching, revision and assessment (e.g. Edmondson 2000, Kinchin 2000a).”