Comparison of Two Concept-Mapping Techniques: Implications for Scoring, Interpretation, and Use.

By Yue Yin, J. Vanides, Maria Araceli Ruiz-Primo, C. Ayala, R. Shavelson. 2005

321 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5debb0be0495c536d81d0e6e8a286b39d37b8cd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. C. P. Constantinou
2. Andreani Baytelman
3. Kalypso Iordanou

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Andreani Baytelman
2. Kalypso Iordanou
3. C. P. Constantinou

Citations in the corpus

• Epistemic beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors of the construction of different types of arguments on socioscientific issues (2020, methodology): “Using a scoring system already reported in the literature (Kyza, Constantinou, & Spanoudis, 2011; Yin et al., 2005), we counted the number of appropriate concepts and the number and quality of appropriate relationships between concepts (propositions) for each student’s concept map.”