Measuring School-wide Positive Behavior Support Implementation

By R. Cohen, Don Kincaid, K. Childs. 2007

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b69a060c2f0b7f257ae3286fc549cf8955e8da7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Brandi Simonsen
2. Nicholas A. Gage
3. Jennifer Freeman
4. Don Kincaid
5. K. Childs
6. H. George
7. G. Sugai
8. D. McCoach

In Education

1. Brandi Simonsen
2. Nicholas A. Gage
3. Jennifer Freeman
4. G. Sugai
5. D. McCoach
6. K. McIntosh
7. M. Matthews
8. Del Siegle

In Social Psychology

1. Brandi Simonsen
2. Nicholas A. Gage
3. Jennifer Freeman
4. G. Sugai
5. D. McCoach
6. M. Matthews
7. R. Horner
8. Matthew T. McBee

Citations in the corpus

• Relationship Between School-Wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports and Academic, Attendance, and Behavior Outcomes in High Schools (2016, background): “Schools that meet 70% of criteria on the overall BoQ or 80% of criteria on the SET are considered implementing with fidelity (Cohen et al., 2007; Horner et al., 2004).”
• The Relationship Between School-Wide Implementation of Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports and Student Discipline Outcomes (2016, methodology): “For information about how the 70% threshold was established, see the initial BoQ validation study (Cohen et al., 2007).”