Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature
By Carmen Fies, Jill A. Marshall. 2006
551 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a6b757a7640e43544df78fd15db7f14a8084263
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Lorena Blasco-Arcas
- Blanca Hernández-Ortega
- Isabel Buil
- F. Sese
- E. Black
- Ann LeSage
- Robin H. Kay
- J. Cain
Citations in the corpus
- Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature (2009, methodology): “Several authors have maintained that the majority of ARS data collected to date is anecdotal or qualitative (Fies & Marshall, 2006; Kaleta & Joosten, 2007; Schackow et al., 2004).”
- INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT An Audience Response System Strategy to Improve Student Motivation, Attention, and Feedback (2009, background): “Audience response systems are receiving increased attention as a tool to aid faculty members in engaging and increasing interactivity with students.(1) These technology-based systems—also known as ‘‘clickers,’’ student response systems, group response systems, and a bevy of other terms—allow instruc”
- Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance (2013, background): “Promoting interactivity is crucial as it leads to better and more effective learning (Bannan-Ritland, 2002; Erickson & Siau, 2003).”