Incorporating Discontinuous Preferences into the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments

By D. Campbell, W. Hutchinson, Riccardo Scarpa. 2008

281 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67fb879b74c2eeecc08ac7d7dea89fe2c62e131c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

Citations in the corpus

Attending to the Reasons for Attribute Non-attendance in Choice Experiments (2011, methodology): “…on unveiling how respondents process attributes, and in particular how attribute non-attendance affects results and how it should be accounted for in CE surveys (e.g. Scarpa et al. 2010; Hensher et al. 2005a; Campbell et al. 2008; Carlsson et al. 2010; Kaye-blake et al. 2009; Scarpa et al. 2009).”
Should Reference Alternatives in Pivot Design SC Surveys be Treated Differently? (2009, background): “…which is represented as a null alternative with the attributes and attribute levels of the alternative not shown as part of the experiment (cf. Campbell et al., 2008; Scarpa et al., 2007a; Willis et al., 2005) et al. A second form of these experiments involves respondents being shown…”
Monitoring Choice Task Attribute Attendance in Nonmarket Valuation of Multiple Park Management Services: Does It Matter? (2010, background): “This issue has been previously addressed in the transport literature by Hensher, Rose, and Greene (2005), who concluded with a warning to practitioners.”
Investigating the contribution of Demand Responsive Transport to a sustainable local public transport system (2014, methodology): “Models considering error components are therefore particularly suitable for a dataset with repeated choice observations from the same individual (Campbell, Hutchinson, & Scarpa, 2008; Greene, 2012) and an RPL extended to error components outperformed a simple RPL for our study.”
Stated and inferred attribute non-attendance in a design of designs approach (2014, methodology): “Moreover, accounting for ANA leads to significantly different willingness to pay estimates which may be lower (Hensher, 2006; Campbell et al., 2008; Scarpa et al., 2009) or higher (Hensher et al.”
Non-attendance to attributes in environmental choice analysis: a latent class specification (2011, methodology): “We utilise the survey data collected and described by Campbell (2007), Campbell et al. (2008, 2009) and Scarpa et al. (2007, 2009) on the general public’s attitudes and preferences regarding rural environmental landscape improvements in the Republic of Ireland.”
Skew and attribute non-attendance within the bayesian mixed logit model (2011, unknown): “These levels of reported ANA are not atypical among those few studies which report the results of such debrief questions, for example Hensher et al. [11] and Campbell et al. [4] indicate that 37% and 36% respectively of their samples reported ignoring one or more attribute.”
A choice experiment on fuel taxation and earmarking in Norway (2011, methodology): “The approach has been applied extensively within inter alia transport studies (pionered by McFadden 1974), marketing (see e.g. Carson et al 1994) and valuation of non-market goods(e.g. Hanley et al. 1998; Carlsson and Martinsson 2001; Campbell et al. 2008).”
Using Conditioning on Observed Choices to Retrieve Individual-Specific Attribute Processing Strategies (2010, background): “Despite a growing number of studies focusing on these issues (see for example Cantillo et al. 2006, Hensher 2006b, Swait 2001, Campbell et al. 2008), in the majority of empirical studies, the entire domain of every attribute is treated as relevant to some degree and included in the utility…”
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017, background): “…an experimental design include, but are not limited to, information order effects (Chrzan 1994; Kjaer et al. 2006), attribute nonattendance (Campbell, Hutchinson, and Scarpa 2008; Scarpa et al. 2009; Scarpa, Thiene, andHensher 2010; Campbell, Hensher, and Scarpa 2011; Hole 2011; Hensher,…”
Food miles or carbon emissions? Exploring labelling preference for food transport footprint with a stated choice study (2013, background): “These allow us to account for a frequently adopted decision heuristic with potentially severe consequence on welfare estimation: attribute nonattendance (Hensher 2006; Campbell et al. 2008; Scarpa et al. 2009).”