Skew and attribute non-attendance within the bayesian mixed logit model

75 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Stated and inferred attribute non-attendance in a design of designs approach (2014, background): “(2010) MNL Individual-level and choice set specific (choice-set ANA) 0utility weights Better model fit and more efficient WTP estimates when accounting for choice-set ANA Balcombe et al. (2011) Mixed Logit Unrestricted and restricted interactions, individual-level 0utility weights Better model fit w”
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017, background): “Systematic conjectures (Hensher and Rose 2009; Hensher and Layton 2010), selective inattention (Scarpa et al. 2009; Balcombe, Burton, and Rigby 2011; Balcombe, Fraser, and McSorley 2015), and sequencing effects are some of the potential anomalies that may arise as respondents attempt to deal with…”
Visual Attention and Attribute Attendance in Multi-Attribute Choice Experiments (2015, methodology): “Interestingly, these findings do not support Balcombe et al. (2011) who found in three out of four data sets that imposing zero utility on respondents with stated ANA improved model performance.”