Should Reference Alternatives in Pivot Design SC Surveys be Treated Differently?
By Stephane Hess, John M. Rose. 2009
131 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b731a8654b2c9520e408bc6cb50cb69247a40241
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Stephane Hess
- John M. Rose
- Michiel C. J. Bliemer
- Emily Lancsar
- Nesha Beharry-Borg
- Milad Haghani
- Harmen Oppewal
- Wim Verbeke
In General Decision Sciences
- John M. Rose
- Stephane Hess
- Michiel C. J. Bliemer
- Nesha Beharry-Borg
- Emily Lancsar
- Milad Haghani
- Harmen Oppewal
- Wim Verbeke
Citations in the corpus
- Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Macro-scale analysis of literature and effectiveness of bias mitigation methods (2021, methodology): “…of reducing HB and the slowly growing use of the referencing method in survey applications (Haghani et al., 2015; Hasnine et al., 2017; Hess, 2008; Hess and Rose, 2009; Masiero and Rose, 2013; Rose and Hess, 2009; Yu et al., 2013), empirical tests of the effectiveness of this method have been…”
- Accounting for Latent Attitudes in Willingness-to-Pay Studies: The Case of Coastal Water Quality Improvements in Tobago (2012, methodology): “Studies in environmental economics and elsewhere often include a constant associated with any status quo or no choice alternative included in surveys, a point discussed for example by Hess and Rose (2008). In the data used for the present study, respondents had the option of indicating that they wou”
- European consumer preferences for beef with nutrition and health claims: A multi-country investigation using discrete choice experiments (2014, background): “Previous studies of choice experiment applications in environmental economics (Scarpa et al., 2007a; Hess and Rose, 2008) and food choice (Caputo et al.”
- Valuing biodiversity enhancement in New Zealand's planted forests: Socioeconomic and spatial determinants of willingness-to-pay (2014, unknown): “Specifying this RPL model with the additional error component addresses the status-quo bias (Haaijer, 1999; Haaijer et al., 2001; Hess and Rose, 2009; Samuelson and Zeckhauser, 1988) and state dependence (Hensher, 2008) effects.6”