A choice experiment on fuel taxation and earmarking in Norway

By H. Sælen, Steffen Kallbekken. 2011

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ef70a23a077c70cc6749141f9d961eea0b1ec88

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Public Preferences for Carbon Tax Attributes (2015, background): “Saelen and Kallbekken (2011) conduct a CE to examine to what extent earmarking revenues from a fuel tax increases the public acceptability of this instrument in Norway.”
Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature (2019, background): “…revenue to vulnerable groups (low income households, elderly) 4 (Carattini et al., 2017; Carson et al., 2010; Gevrek and Uyduranoglu, 2015; Saelen and Kallbekken, 2011) 1 (Baranzini and Carattini, 2017) + Equal share of revenue given to each taxpayer 1 (Carattini et al., 2017) 1 (Bristow…”
Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns (2011, methodology): “As mentioned earlier, the effect on acceptability of how the revenues are used is the main topic in the paper by Sælen and Kallbekken (2010).”
French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies (2020, background): “Subsequent literature has confirmed the importance of selfinterest (e.g. Fischer et al., 2011; Baranzini & Carattini, 2017) although Kallbekken & Sælen (2011) find that perception of the tax’ effectiveness and its distributive properties play a larger role in Norway.”
What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies (2016, background): “In a similar vein, Sælen and Kallbekken (2011) show in a choice experiment that a majority of Norwegians would support a rise in fossil fuel taxes if revenues are earmarked for environmental purposes, whereas without earmarking a majority prefers a decrease of such taxes.”
Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data (2017, methodology): “Acceptability is supposed to increase with earmarking and we expect earmarking for environmental purposes to have the largest impact (cf. e.g. Dresner et al. 2006; Steg et al. 2006; Kallbekken and Aasen 2010; Sælen and Kallbekken 2011).”