Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies
By R. Johnston, Kevin J. Boyle, Wiktor L. Adamowicz, Jeffrey Bennett, Roy Brouwer, T. Cameron, William Michael Hanemann, N. Hanley, M. Ryan, Riccardo Scarpa and 2 more. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2017
1,464 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0529761f99eb384dc1210659ec812f5b51f6d10f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In General Decision Sciences
Citations in the corpus
- Does happiness data say urban parks are worth it? (2018, methodology): “Over the past decades, a traditional way of valuing environmental quality has been to use property data with hedonic price model or to use contingent valuation method (CVM) by asking people whether they would vote for a proposed change at specified cost (Boyle, 2017; Johnston et al., 2017).”
- The Role of Stated Preference Valuation Methods in Understanding Choices and Informing Policy (2019, neutral): “information for economists and policy analysts (Johnston et al. 2017).”