Social Categorization, Social Identification, and Rejection of Deviant Group Members
By J. Marques, Dominic Abrams, D. Páez, M. Hogg. 2008
123 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/66a5c8e2ced79da62186489d0e8c7ccb3e2cbed3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Sociology and Political Science
- Lindsey Cameron
- A. Rutland
- Rebecca Petley
- Rosa Hossain
- Yuri Mishina
- Loris Vezzali
- D. Giovannini
- Miles Hewstone
Citations in the corpus
- A General Theory of Organizational Stigma (2009, background): “Thus, scholars suggest that because generalized value incongruence is viewed as a strong threat to the stability of the group, members perceived as value incongruent are categorized as deviants (Marques et al. 2001).”
- When and why does extended contact work? (2011, methodology): “Each measure of direct contact was assessed by adapting a scale used by McGlothlin and Killen (2006). Children were shown a set of five pictures made up of cartoon faces of girls and boys representing the ethnic in-group (white–English) and the ethnic out-group (Indian–English).”