Identifying Academically Gifted English-Language Learners Using Nonverbal Tests

By D. Lohman, K. Korb, Joni M. Lakin. 2008

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6581b677c36c3fe75d8a60a22783458c36e17411

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Jaret Hodges
2. Juliana Tay
3. Yukiko Maeda
4. Dana L. Thomson
5. Rhoda Rosen
6. P. Olszewski-Kubilius
7. Saiying Steenbergen-Hu
8. Marcia Gentry

In Statistics and Probability

1. Jaret Hodges
2. Juliana Tay
3. Saiying Steenbergen-Hu
4. Yukiko Maeda
5. Marcia Gentry

Citations in the corpus

• A Meta-Analysis of Gifted and Talented Identification Practices (2018, methodology): “In the past decade, this issue of traditional versus nontraditional identification has often been debated among researchers (Giessman et al., 2013; Lakin & Lohman, 2011; Lohman et al., 2008; Naglieri & Ford, 2003).”
• Minority Achievement Gaps in STEM (2017, methodology): “Also, following the recommendations of Lohman et al. (2008), using both the NNAT and achievement test scores resulted in a group of students whose aptitudes better matched the STEM program that was the focus of Project Excite.”