Explaining After by Before: Basic Aspects of a Dynamic Systems Approach to the Study of Development.

By P. V. van Geert, Henderien W. Steenbeek. 2005

228 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/64fa92854136bcc2193ea3da96bd7072bde14a90

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Children’s Creativity: A Theoretical Framework and Systematic Review (2018, background): “In the past two decades, this theory has been advocated more and more in the field of education as an approach to better understand processes of learning and teaching (Jörg, Davis, & Nickmans, 2007; Koopmans & Stamovlasis, 2016; Steenbeek & van Geert, 2013; van Geert & Steenbeek, 2005).”
The dynamics of scaffolding (2005, background): “In our view, such a more detailed model must, in the first place, describe how these basic dynamics are embodied and how they are socially situated (Steenbeek, 2006; Steenbeek and van Geert, 2005; Van Geert and Steenbeek, 2005).”
A New Paradigm for Developmental Science: Relationism and Relational-Developmental Systems (2013, background): “This includes work entailing enaction (e.g., Stewart et al., 2010 ), dynamic systems (e.g., van Geert & Steenbeck, 2005; also see footnote 3), dialectic and other forms of transactionalism (e.g., Kuczynski & Parkin, 2009 ), and social mutualism (e.g., Goode, 2007), among others.”
Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system (2011, unknown): “A useful perspective for illustrating the dynamism of aspects of Joana’s agentic system is to employ both short-term (micro-level) and long-term (macro-level) perspectives (cf. Van Geert and Steenbeek, 2005).”
The Dynamic Systems Approach as Metatheory for Developmental Psychology (2007, methodology): “…systems are recursive in nature, involving an iterative process whereby the product (system state t + 1) of the equation’s initial run feeds back to the equation as a new initial system state to produce in turn a later system state, t + 2, and so on [van Geert, 1991; van Geert & Steenbeck, 2005].”
The Emergence of Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy in the Oral and Written Production of Five Chinese Learners of English (2006, methodology): “However, from a complex dynamic systems approach, intraindividual variability is an important source of information about the underlying developmental process (van Geert and Steenbeek 2005b; Bassano and van Geert unpublished manuscript).”
Taking Emergence Seriously: The Centrality of Circular Causality for Dynamic Systems Approaches to Development (2011, background): “Unfortunately, with few exceptions [Lewis, in press; van der Maas, 1995], DS proponents either downplay [van Geert, 1998a; van Geert & Steenbeek, 2005] or actively ignore the significance of this critical ontological rift between perspectives.”
The Contribution of Complex Dynamic Systems to Development (2011, background): “These properties are examples of the nonlinearity of complex systems (for overviews, see, e.g., van Geert, 1994, 2003, 2008; van Geert & Fischer, 2009; van Geert & Steenbeek, 2005).”
The Emotional Lives of Companion Animals: Attachment and Subjective Claims by Owners of Cats and Dogs (2016, background): “In human-to-human attachment relationships, participants “attune” to each other’s emotions and behavior (Fogel 1993; Van Geert and Steenbeek 2005).”
Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning: Change, Stability, and Context. (2014, background): “…implies that, in order to understand the development of a dynamic system, we need to examine the phenomenon under study in its naturally occurring context, be it a structured ESL classroom (Larsen– Freeman, 2006), or a more unpredictable kindergarten playground (Van Geert & Steenbeek, 2005).”