Getting the Measure of Emotion - and the Cautionary Tale of Emotional Intelligence

By Stephen J. Fineman. 2004

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/649cf366017b595ba46f8f1b4412e18f8432af3d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

‘It’s good to be angry’: Enacting anger in construction project management to achieve perceived leader effectiveness (2011, background): “In so doing, we take a distinctive position akin to those writers who are interested in phenomenology as a way of eliciting perceived experiences of individuals under investigation (e.g. Dasborough et al., 2003; Fineman, 2004; Sandberg, 2005).”
Researching Emotional Reflexivity (2015, background): “It is difficult to research like much emotional experience (Fineman, 2004).”
The Psychology of Careers in Industrial - Organizational Settings: A Critical but Appreciative Analysis (2008, background): “The growing attention to the role of social relationships in career development is also noted in Fouad’s (2007) review of vocational psychology.”
A Critical Realist Approach To Institutional Entrepreneurship (2006, background): “As such, measuring tends to shape the definition of the object (Fineman, 2004; Porter, 1995).”
Can emotional intelligence be trained? A meta-analytical investigation (2019, background): “…intelligence as a legitimate construct (see Antonakis, Ashkanasy, & Dasborough, 2009; Locke, 2005; Mayer, Salovey, & Caruso, 2008), human resource practitioners spend considerable resources selecting and training a more emotionally intelligent workforce (Fineman, 2004; Nafukho & Muyia, 2014).”
7 Emotion in Organizations: A Review and Theoretical Integration (2007, background): “Likewise, there are detailed critiques (eg, Fineman, 2004 ; Matthews et al, 2002 ), covering topics as diverse as conceptual clarity, divergent validity from existing constructs, psychometric shortcomings, the questionable validity of pencil-and-paper measures and scoring difficulties, notably the”
Emotional intelligence: an integrative meta-analysis and cascading model. (2010, methodology): “This purported relationship between EI and work performance has also stimulated interest among human resource practitioners, who have made EI a widely used tool for personnel hiring and training (Fineman, 2004).”
A multi-level view of leadership and emotions: Leading with emotional labor (2011, background): “Fineman (2004), for example, has argued that emotional intelligence, especially once promulgated by top management, can become a manipulative device.”
Enterprise Ritual: A Theory of Entrepreneurial Emotion and Exchange (2008, unknown): “…effects (as has been undertaken in relation to 'mood', see above), is more likely to encourage research methods that produce findings that 'are " thick " in texture and interpretive – " rich " in meanings, multidimensional and frank about ambiguities and contradictions' (Fineman, 2004, p.732).”
Thinking critically about affect in organization studies: Why it matters (2017, unknown): “…important, and while we acknowledge the relevance of on-going work on emotions for organization studies (Barsade and Gibson, 2007; Elfenbein, 2008; Fineman, 2003, 2004, 2010; Loseke, 2009; Stearns and Stearns, 1985; Wright and Nyberg, 2012), for the purpose of this Special Issue, we distinguish…”
Thrilled by the discourse, suffering through the experience: Emotions in project-based work (2014, background): “Such an approach is built on the premise that emotions have an important place in organizing processes, both as being experienced by people while taking part in these processes and as influencing these same organizing processes (Fineman, 2004; Fineman and Sturdy, 1999).”
On Being Positive: Concerns and Counterpoints (2006, background): “These are better approached in emic accounts and local epistemologies, by means of, for example, interpretive analyses, discourse analyses, and phenomenological inquiries (Fineman, 2004; Sandage & Hill, 2001; Tennen & Affleck, 2003; Young-Eisendrath, 2003).”