A Critical Realist Approach To Institutional Entrepreneurship

By B. Leca, P. Naccache. 2006

366 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8cd0236d5bdf84dce2fee6665545d10e5d35d79

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Institutional Entrepreneurship for Knowledge Regions: In Search of a Fresh Set of Questions for Regional Innovation Studies (2011, background): “The many ambitions of collaborating and/or competing actors to shape institutions for regional development are a form of `embedded agency' [see more, concerning embedded agency, in Battilana (2006); Leca and Naccache (2006); Seo and Creed (2002)].”
Agency and Institutions: A Review on Institutional Entrepreneurship (2009, background): “Position within the social environment is crucial (Battilana, 2006), as is awareness of other fields (Greenwood and Suddaby, 2006) and diverse institutional logics (Leca and Naccache, 2006).”
Institutional change in economic geography (2014, background): “Theoretically, the idea of purposive institutional design leads to the paradox of embedded action (Powell and DiMaggio, 1991): how is institutional change possible if the actors’ intentions, actions, and rationalities are conditioned by the institutions that they wish to change (Leca and Naccache, 2”
CRAFTING QUALITATIVE RESEARCH: MORGAN AND SMIRCICH 30 YEARS ON. (2010, background): “They use texts and secondary data, interviews, case studies, and so on to identify the mechanisms influencing the development of socioeconomic and political phenomena (e.g., Burgoyne, 2009; Leca & Naccache, 2006).”
What Makes an Entrepreneurship Study Entrepreneurial? Toward A Unified Theory of Entrepreneurial Agency (2020, background): “Institutional entrepreneurship scholars are therefore unified by their interest in better explaining how institutions arise and change (Leca & Naccache, 2006) through the analytical lens of individual agency, interests, and power (Garud, Hardy et al., 2007).”
How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship (2009, background): “The most recent developments draw on critical realism (Leca & Naccache, 2006 ; Mutch, 2007 ; Thornton & Ocasio, 2008 ), which considers simultaneously the influence of actors' actions and the structures in which they are embedded; relational sociology (Battilana, 2006 ; Delbridge & Edwards, 200”
Reflexivity: The Role of Embedded Social Position and Entrepreneurial Social Skill in Processes of Field Level Change (2016, background): “This is the paradox of embedded agency (Seo & Creed, 2002; Leca & Naccache, 2006), which questions the internal coherence of a theory that argues, on one hand, that institutional norms are so 3 totalizing that actors cannot even conceive of opportunities for change, and on the other, that some…”
Sustainability in entrepreneurship: A tale of two logics (2011, background): “…the nexus between institutional theory and entrepreneurship is discussed in the realm of institutional entrepreneurship; the focus is up on how actors induce institutional change by challenging existing field arrangements and so, infusing a new logic into the field (e.g. Leca and Naccache, 2006).”