Measurement From a Hierarchical Point of View
By J. Gustafsson. 2002
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6470e0e123e31d9e5aec9f6f3d28f1f0e5855c67
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- T. Asparouhov
- J. Kammeyer-Mueller
- B. Muthén
- T. Judge
- A. Kvist
- Andreas Demetriou
- A. Hirschi
- Yair Berson
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- B. Muthén
- T. Asparouhov
- J. Kammeyer-Mueller
- A. Kvist
- T. Judge
- J. Gustafsson
- Andreas Demetriou
- Beno Csapó
In Management Science and Operations Research
- T. Asparouhov
- B. Muthén
- J. Gustafsson
- T. Judge
- J. Kammeyer-Mueller
- A. Kvist
- Alexandre J. S. Morin
- Beno Csapó
Citations in the corpus
- General and specific measures in organizational behavior research: Considerations, examples, and recommendations for researchers (2012, background): “Gustafsson (2002) has argued that ascertaining which component of variance is operating requires measuring both general and specific constructs.”
- The relation between fluid intelligence and the general factor as a function of cultural background: a test of Cattell's investment theory (2008, background): “It should be observed that in this model there was no Gf-factor for theGf subset of tests, which is due to the fact that the equivalence of Gf and g causes this residual factor to disappear (see Gustafsson, 2001, 2002).”
- Bayesian structural equation modeling: a more flexible representation of substantive theory. (2012, methodology): “Factor analyses of these data have been described, for example, by Harman (1976, pp. 123–132) and Gustafsson (2002).”
- Can we be intelligent about intelligence?: Why education needs the concept of plastic general ability (2007, background): “Gustafsson (2002) has recently reminded us that with hierarchical models such as this, the most general factor is actually best measured by a heterogeneous set of tests acting together.”