How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations
By Morten T. Hansen, Bjørn Løvås. 2004
407 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62bcf152ae7e4d28eda6493673742e35a92b14e7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
- Ram Mudambi
- Susan M. Mudambi
- Riitta Katila
- Anupama Phene
- Paul Almeida
- Julian Birkinshaw
- Glenn Hoetker
- Gautam Ahuja
Citations in the corpus
- Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations (2004, background): “Such differences are important in the context of innovation because, increasingly, research suggests that the technological landscape is differentiated across geographic space (Freeman and Soete, 1997; Katila and Ahuja, 2002; Hansen and Lovas, 2004).”
- Global Innovation in MNCs: The Effects of Subsidiary Self-Determination and Teamwork† (2007, background): “The ability of multinational corporations (MNCs) to leverage their innovation competencies across globally dispersed subsidiaries is an increasingly valuable source of competitive advantage (Almeida, 1996; Frost, 2001; Hansen, 2002; Hansen and Lovas, 2004; Nobel and Birkinshaw, 1998).”
- Innovation in a global consulting firm: when the problem is too much diversity (2010, background): “well as cultural and national differences (Barkema and Vermeulen, 1997; Hansen and Løvås, 2004).”
- Conventional and Reverse Knowledge Flows in Multinational Corporations† (2008, unknown): “We found that relevance is an important factor influencing knowledge flows within multinational organizations, which concurs with ideas in the literature (e.g., Hansen & Løvas, 2004; Schulz, 2003).”