Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with Horizontal Competition

By Lode Li. Management Sciences, 2002

788 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6275ddb7c7c9711f5f96e4e18805cec130840c84

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

Nonlinear Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Small Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Resource Orchestration Capabilities (2013, background): “Moreover, greater trust makes a firm less likely to be concerned with the opportunity for ‘leakage’ of its intellectual assets to horizontal competitors when vertically sharing with upstream supplier partners or downstream consumer partners (Li, 2002).”
Contracting and Information Sharing Under Supply Chain Competition (2008, methodology): “Another stream of research more relevant to our work studies the incentive for firms in a supply chain to share information (Li 2002; Zhang 2002; Li and Zhang 2002, 2008).1 Most of the work here assumes linear price contracts offered by a single manufacturer and considers imperfect demand signal.”
Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with a Common Retailer (2013, methodology): “Our analysis here applies to both the production diseconomy and economy models.”
Demand Forecast Sharing in Supply Chains (2009, methodology): “In prior studies of supply chain information sharing, either truthful information sharing was assumed or the model was set up such that no party had an incentive to lie (e.g., Li 2002, Zhang 2002).”
Platform Information Transparency and Effects on Third‐Party Suppliers and Offline Retailers (2021, background): “By contrast, under the wholesale model, the shortcoming in demand information compels the supplier to charge a low whole-sale price in terms of expectation (e.g., Li 2002, Zhang 2002), which might beneﬁt the platform.”
Supplier Encroachment Under Asymmetric Information (2014, background): “Recall from the results of Li and Zhang (2002) that this will never occur in the absence of encroachment.”
Information sharing and supply chain performance: the role of connectivity and willingness (2007, background): “Advances in information technology have changed modern business practice, making collaborative supply chain management (SCM) possible (Cachon and Fisher, 2000; Chatfield et al., 2004; Lee et al., 2000; Li, 2002).”
Information sharing in supply chains: Incentives for information distortion (2007, methodology): “The normality assumption, though widely used (e.g., Vives (1984), Gal-Or (1985), Raju and Roy (2000) and Li (2002), has limitations because it allows for negative values of demand.”
Supplier Encroachment as an Enhancement or a Hindrance to Nonlinear Pricing (2015, background): “For instance, Li (2002) and Zhang (2002) investigate information sharing in a setting where a central supplier sells to multiple competing resellers that have better demand information, while Ha and Tong (2008) and Ha et al. (2011) focus on a setting with two competing supply chains and explore the…”
Retailer Information Sharing with Supplier Encroachment (2018, methodology): “Therefore, the extant literature (Arya and Mittendorf 2013, Ha and Tong 2008, Li 2002) suggests that a retailer should always be reluctant to share her private demand information with the supplier to maintain an advantage over the supplier in information.”