The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: An Integrative Approach to Emotions in Education

By Reinhard Pekrun, A. Frenzel, Thomas Goetz, R. Perry. 2007

1,159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/618a147fd937cda73c328a96b8ff5c959bbb6285

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Teacher Emotion, Emotional Labor and Teacher Identity (2014, background): “Two secondary appraisals that are key to our discussion here are perceptions of autonomy (Lazarus, 1991; Schutz & Davis, 2000; Pekrun et al., 2007) (i.”
High self-control predicts more positive emotions, better engagement, and higher achievement in school (2014, background): “The study of emotions in the school context has mostly been dominated by Pekrun’s (2000, 2006; Pekrun et al. 2007) control-value theory of achievement emotions which has emerged as a dominant framework for examining emotions in achievement-related settings.”
Advanced learners’ foreign language-related emotions across the four skills (2018, background): “…specific achievement emotions when they feel in control of, or out of control of, achievement activities and outcomes that are subjectively important to them, implying that control appraisals and value appraisals are the proximal determinants of these emotions” (Pekrun et al., 2007, p. 16).”
Identifying patterns of appraising tests in first-year college students: Implications for anxiety and emotion regulation during test taking. (2008, methodology): “This is consistent with the control-value (Pekrun et al., 2007) theory of emotions, which states that students who perceive themselves as in control are more likely to select task-oriented strategies.”
Emotions about Teaching about Human-Induced Climate Change (2013, background): “Emotions based specifically on the topic of instruction could interfere with motivation and cognition in a similar way to emotions experienced in the learning environment (Pekrun et al., 2007).”