Identifying patterns of appraising tests in first-year college students: Implications for anxiety and emotion regulation during test taking.
By H. Davis, C. Distefano, P. Schutz. 2008
93 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9796deeda0f4bbb9974dacbdef036511b606c45c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Social Psychology
- Mei-Lin Chang
- Allyson Fiona Hadwin
- Elizabeth A. Webster
- H. Davis
- Jamie Taxer
- H. Koomen
- Y. Lee
- M. Hen
Citations in the corpus
- Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, and College Exam Grades. (2013, background): “Davis et al. (2008) and Pintrich and De Groot (1990) support Chapell et al.'s (2005) results.”
- Emotions and emotion regulation in undergraduate studying: examining students’ reports from a self-regulated learning perspective (2015, background): “…and suppression (e.g. Gross & John, 2003; Srivastava et al., 2009) or (b) examined emotion regulation mainly in the context of test-taking (e.g. Davis et al., 2008; Schutz & Davis, 2000), we sought to explore the strategies students enact while working on a variety of studying activities and…”
- An Appraisal Perspective of Teacher Burnout: Examining the Emotional Work of Teachers (2009, background): “dampen what are you feeling (Davis et al. 2008; Lazarus 2000).”
- Toward a theoretical model to understand teacher emotions and teacher burnout in the context of student misbehavior: Appraisal, regulation and coping (2013, background): “The positive effect of problem-focused coping is also consistent with findings by Lazarus (1993) and Davis et al. (2008).”
- Understanding the Role of Teacher Appraisals in Shaping the Dynamics of their Relationships with Students: Deconstructing Teachers’ Judgments of Disruptive Behavior/Students (2009, background): “In part, this reflects our orientation toward a control-value theory of motivation (Pekrun et al. 2007; Davis et al. 2008 ).”