Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise

By John H. Dunning, S. Lundan. 2008

831 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/606710151f01658cbc16e7bed44b4476b4f83906

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Behind ownership decision of Chinese outward FDI: Resources and institutions (2010, background): “Scott, 1995). It proposes that firms make their strategic choices based on the dynamic interaction between institution and organization ( Dunning & Lundan, 2008; Gao et al., 2009; Li & Peng, 2008; Peng, 2002).”
Location and the multinational enterprise: John Dunning's thoughts on receiving the Journal of International Business Studies 2008 Decade Award (2009, background): “6A full discussion of asset-seeking FDI and MNE activity with accompanying references is set out in Dunning and Lundan (2008a).”
Current debates in global strategy (2009, neutral): “As indicated earlier, there is an underlying theme that connects these four debates: the institution-based view of global strategy (Peng et al. 2008; see also Dunning and Lundan 2008).”
Policy uncertainty, derivatives use, and firm-level FDI (2017, background): “In comparison to domestic firms, Dunning and Lundan (2008) note that MNCs have more opportunities than domestic firms to utilize a combination of organizational and external resources to spread market risks and enhance performance, by means of multinationality.”
Contextualizing Experience Effects in International Business: A Study of Ownership Strategies (2009, neutral): “Each country has its idiosyncrasies in terms of business practices, institutions and resource endowment, which affect the way businesses operate (Peng, Wang & Jiang, 2008; Dunning & Lundan, 2008; Meyer, Estrin, Bhaumik & Peng, 2008).”
Institutional differences and the development of entrepreneurial ventures: A comparison of the venture capital industries in Latin America and Asia (2009, background): “Thus institutions not only create limits for organizations and individuals but also facilitate opportunities for action (Bruton & Ahlstrom, 2003; Dunning & Lundan, 2008).”
The Role of the State in Explaining the Internationalization of Emerging Market Enterprises (2015, positive): “…underdeveloped, state ownership comes with advantages (e.g. stronger protection of property rights, better public provision, insider information and control over important assets) that help EMEs offset ownership disadvantages in foreign markets (Aggarwal and Agmon, 1990; Dunning and Lundan, 2008a).”
The Institution-Based View as a Third Leg for a Strategy Tripod. (2009, positive): “Third, research on multinational enterprises (MNEs) can be further propelled by the institution-based view (Dunning & Lundan, 2008; Kostova, Roth, & Dacin, 2008).”
Institutional open access at home and outward internationalization (2015, neutral): “A voluminous literature suggests that host country institutions affect the inward internationalization of foreign entrants (Chacar, Newburry, & Vissa, 2010; Dunning & Lundan, 2008; Holmes et al., 2013; Luo & Peng, 1999; Meyer et al., 2009; Yang, Tipton, & Li, 2011).”
Do cross-border mergers and acquisitions increase short-term market performance? The case of Chinese firms (2017, methodology): “Building on the analysis of North (1990), Dunning and Lundan (2008) show the direct link between host-country institutional environments and the location-based (L) advantages in the OLI paradigm.”
Does ownership structure of emerging-market firms affect their outward FDI? The case of the Indian automotive and pharmaceutical sectors (2010, background): “Building on North (2005), Dunning and Lundan (2008) argue that institutional factors influence behaviour of firms, and we extend this to examining the extent and nature of internationalization of firms.”
Export propensity and intensity of subsidiaries in emerging economies (2008, background): “Hence, efficient institutions are a form of locational advantage that helps attract export-oriented foreign investment ( Dunning & Lundan, 2008 ).”
How do networks and learning drive M&As? An institutional comparison between China and the United States (2009, background): “Network embeddedness may also be important to emerging economy settings, where there has been an emergence of 'network capitalism' that thrives on interfirm relationships (Dunning and Lundan, 2008; Meyer et al., 2009; Peng and Heath, 1996).”
FDI location choice of Chinese multinationals in East and Southeast Asia: Traditional economic factors and institutional perspective (2012, background): “More recently, it is further suggested that institutions affect all three components of the paradigm (Dunning & Lundan, 2008).”