Intuition: Its Powers and Perils

By D. Myers. 2002

391 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5effb6ec901625646d974401f493597c3215198d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Exploring Intuition and its Role in Managerial Decision Making (2007, background): “…Thoughts that are reached with little apparent effort, and typically without conscious awareness; they involve little or no conscious deliberation Myers (2002: 128–129) The capacity for direct, immediate knowledge prior to rational analysis Kahneman (2003: 697) Thoughts and preferences that come…”
Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree. (2009, background): “In an effort that spanned several years, we attempted to answer one basic question: Under what conditions are the intuitions of professionals worthy of trust? We do not claim that the conclusions we reached are surprising (many were anticipated by Shanteau, 1992, Hogarth, 2001, and Myers, 2002, amon”
Developing Intuitive Awareness in Management Education (2007, background): “Ireland, 2005; Sadler-Smith & Shefy, 2004; Sinclair & Ashkanasy, 2005); psychology (Hogarth, 2001; Myers, 2002); and more generally (Gladwell, 2005; Klein, 2003).”
Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious (2007, unknown): “This includes Ambady and Rosenthal, 1993, Cosmides and Tooby, 1992, Gazzaniga, 1998, Hogarth, 2001, Kahneman et al., 1982, Myers, 2002, Payne et al., 1993, Pinker, 1997, and Wegner, 2002.”
MAPS OF BOUNDED RATIONALITY: A PERSPECTIVE ON INTUITIVE JUDGMENT AND CHOICE (2003, background): “…intuition and reasoning has been a topic of considerable interest in the intervening decades (among many others, see Epstein, 1994; Hammond, 1996; Jacoby, 1981, 1996; and numerous models collected by Chaiken & Trope, 1999; for comprehensive reviews of intuition, see Hogarth, 2002; Myers, 2002).”
A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. (2003, background): “…intuition and reasoning has been a topic of considerable interest in the intervening decades (among many others, see Epstein, 1994; Hammond, 2000; Jacoby, 1991, 1996; and numerous models collected by Chaiken & Trope, 1999; for comprehensive reviews of intuition, see Hogarth, 2001; Myers, 2002).”
The duality of mind: an historical perspective (2009, background): “Reyna is one of an increasing number of authors to emphasize the idea that intuitive decision making can be highly effective and often superior to that based on reflection (Dijksterhuis et al. 2006; Gigerenzer 2007; Gladwell 2005; Myers 2002).”
Expertise-Based Intuition and Decision Making in Organizations (2010, background): “Several general audience books summarizing the extant anecdotal and scientific work on intuition (e.g., D. G. Myers, 2002; Gladwell, 2005; Klein, 2003) have created a flurry of interest in the topic, and recent reviews within management and related literatures have provided evidence that intuition…”
Behavioral and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship: entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation (2007, methodology): “Many ingenious methods have been devised to investigate such processing (e.g., Myers, 2002), but perhaps the most revealing are those based on the methods of neuroscience, including scans of activity in various regions of the brain as individuals perform a wide range of activities.”
The role of intuition and improvisation in project management (2006, background): “Alongside these developments there has been an upsurge of interest in the role of intuition in management as one way of overcoming the limits of rationality in loosely structured situations [25] [26] [27] [28] [29].”
Demystifying Intuition: What It Is, What It Does, and How It Does It (2010, background): “Some authors believe that it requires two qualitatively different processing systems to account for the differences between intuitive and analytic information processing (e.g., Chen & Chaiken, 1999; Epstein, 1973, 1994, 2003; Hogarth, 2001; Kahneman’s, 2003, revised view; Myers, 2002; Petty & Wegene”