reading the mind in the eyes
By Shir Tragash, R. Wohl. 2018
175 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e46350fa7f71c4e119db6079b76c2fe5f846eaa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Roberta Michnick Golinkoff
- Kathy Hirsh-Pasek
- Rebecca A. Dore
- Steven J. Amendum
- Angeline S. Lillard
- Deena Skolnick Weisberg
- Peter W. Jusczyk
Citations in the corpus
- Men, women and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done? (2020, unknown): “, 2010; summarized in M. L. Wilson et al., 2017, Table 1). This may have resulted in the evolution of males that are somewhat more risk-prone than their female counterparts, not just behaviourally but developmentally as well. An alternative, non-adaptationist explanation is that sex differences in v”
- Predicting brain-age from multimodal imaging data captures cognitive impairment (2016, unknown): “In addition to brain structure, functional connectivity based 58 on resting-state fMRI data (Craddock et al., 2013) also has 59 the potential to provide clinically-relevant biomarkers (Crad60 dock et al., 2009; Castellanos et al., 2013), as the data is eas61 ily acquired in a clinical setting (Greic”
- Theory of Mind: a Hidden Factor in Reading Comprehension? (2018, methodology): “In this study, exposure to fiction was related to measures such as the Reading the Mind in the Eyes task (Baron-Cohen et al. 2001), in which participants see an image of a person’s eye region and must choose which of four possible mental states the person is experiencing.”