The Factor Structure of Global Self-Esteem among Adolescents and Adults ☆

By Robert F Corwyn. 2000

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e3fd01ddac22ac00237598ff03eda3442d41951

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Parental Confirmation and Affection as Mediators of Family Communication Patterns and Children's Mental Well-Being (2007, methodology): “First, participants completed Rosenberg's (1965) Self Esteem Scale (SES), the most widely used measure of global self-esteem in personality theory and research ( Blascovich & Tomaka, 1991 ; Corwyn, 2000 ).”
Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. (2005, methodology): “Although psychometric studies have generally supported the unidimensionality of the RSES (Carmines & Zeller, 1979; Corwyn, 2000; Dunbar, Ford, Hunt, & Der, 2000; Fleming & Courtney, 1984; Marsh, 1996; O’Brien, 1985), when multiple factors have been reported, the tendency is for the positively and…”
Wording Effects in Self-Esteem Scales: Methodological Artifact or Response Style? (2003, unknown): “…self-esteemusing versions of the Rosenberg (1965) Self-Esteem Scale (e.g., Alwin & Jackson, 1981; Bachman & O’Malley, 1986; Bagozzi, 1993; Carmines & Zeller, 1979; Corwyn, 2000; Goldsmith, 1986, Kohn, 1977; Marsh, 1986, 1996; Tomás & Oliver, 1999; Wang,Siegal,Falck,&Carlson,2001).”
Self-esteem and mental health in adolescents – level and stability during a school year (2019, background): “86) (36) and has been validated in the adolescent population (37).”
Measuring Adolescent Life Satisfaction (2016, methodology): “The psychometric properties of the RSES reported in several studies are good (Corwyn, 2000).”
The α and the ω of Congeneric Test Theory: An Extension of Reliability and Internal Consistency to Heterogeneous Tests (2005, methodology): “The RSES was once thought to be heterogeneous, but recent investigations have indicated that it may be composed of a single attribute of self-esteem and two methods attributes reflecting item wording (Corwyn, 2000).”
Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (2008, background): “…original RSES represents a one-dimensional construct of self-esteem based on a solid theoretical rationale, although contaminated by method artefacts primarily associated with negatively worded items (Corwyn, 2000; Greenberger, Chen, Dmitrieva, & Farruggia, 2003; Marsh, 1996; Tomás & Oliver, 1999).”
Correlates of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Method Effects (2006, methodology): “Indeed, Marsh (1996) and Corwyn (2000) demonstrated that age and reading ability vary with method effects. Wang et al. (2001) further suggested that other sample properties (i.”
Frustration Intolerance Beliefs: Their Relationship with Depression, Anxiety, and Anger, in a Clinical Population (2006, unknown): “Careful preliminary analysis and screening of ‘‘careless responses’’ was undertaken (Corwyn, 2000).”
Longitudinal Invariance of Self-Esteem and Method Effects Associated With Negatively Worded Items (2002, methodology): “The impact of item wording on the latent structure of self-report instruments has received considerable attention, particularly among researchers of global self-esteem (e.g., Bachman & O’Malley, 1986; Carmines & Zeller, 1974, 1979; Corwyn, 2000; Goldsmith, 1986; Hensley & Roberts, 1976; Kaufman, Ras”
Factor Structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (2013, methodology): “…two RSES developmental constructs, other researchers argue that bidimensionality in the RSES simply points to ignorable method effects (Carmine & Zeller, 1979; Corwyn, 2000; Marsh, 1996; Tomás & Oliver, 1999), which often result when positively and negatively worded items appear in the same scale.”
The Role of Parental and Peer Attachment in the Psychological Health and Self-Esteem of Adolescents (2004, background): “While there has been a vigorous debate on whether or not the multidimensionality of self-esteem is an artifact of the specific measurement instruments employed (e.g., Corwyn, 2000; Marsh, 1996; Tomas and Oliver, 1999), there is some evidence to suggest that there are at least 2 underlying evaluati”
Item-wording and the dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: do they matter? (2003, methodology): “The model that emerged as having the best fit for Tomas and Oliver (1999) included method effects for both positively worded and negatively worded items; however, Corwyn (2000) found the method effects to occur primarily for the negatively worded items.”