Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem.

By D. Schmitt, Jüri Allik. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005

1,549 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b65c9bac7a42ac4a52a7be4d8d58b152d9124d11

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: the case for the universality of self-esteem (2015, background): “…score above the theoretical midpoint of the rating scale (Brown, Cai, Oakes, & Deng, 2009; Cai et al., 2011; Cai, Wu, & Brown, 2009; Kwan, Kuang, & Hui, 2009; Schmitt & Allik, 2005; Yamaguchi et al., 2007; but see Diener & Diener, 1995) indicating universally positive self-attitudes or self-love.”
The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. (2006, background): “Specifically, they reported modest to strong correlations between self-esteem and Neuroticism and between self-esteem and Extraversion in an extremely large Internet sample (see also Schmitt & Allik, 2005).”
The positive effects of mindfulness on self-esteem (2013, methodology): “The RSES is a valid and reliable measure of self-esteem (α= 0.81; Schmidt & Allik, 2005).”
Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do (2009, background): “…scale midpoints, while trait self-enhancement (e.g., self-esteem) shows the same structure (i.e., same pattern of correlations with other personality traits) across both Eastern and Western cultures (Cai, Wu, & Brown, in press; Schmitt & Allik, 2005; Sheldon, Elliot, Kasser, & Kim, 2001).”
Differences in Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking Across 63 Countries (2017, methodology): “The 10-item Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale was completed by 16,998 individuals from 53 cultures (α = .81; Schmitt & Allik, 2005).”
The effect of culture on perception and cognition: A conceptual framework (2014, background): “…& Heatherton, 2001) because people tend to favor group-esteem over self-esteem, hold a dominant interdependent self-construal, make fewer self-serving attributions to protect their self-esteem (Schmitt & Allik, 2005), and have low compensatory self-protective attitudes (Brockner & Chen, 1996).”
Social Identity, Self-Esteem, and Mental Health in Autism (2017, positive): “The properties of this scale have been extensively investigated and it has been found to have good reliability (Schmitt & Allik, 2005) and validity (Sinclair et al., 2010).”
Self‐esteem and culture: Differences in cognitive self‐evaluations or affective self‐regard? (2007, methodology): “Previous research has found that EastAsians score lower on self-report measures of self-esteem than do Americans, Canadians, and Western Europeans ( Schmitt & Allik, 2005 ).”
Escala de Autoestima de Rosenberg (EAR): validade fatorial e consistência interna (2010, background): “…pesquisas, a escala é vista como unidimensional, mas são incluídos os efeitos do método para os itens negativos (Gana, Alaphilippe & Bailly, 2005; Schmitt & Allik, 2005), enquanto outros pesquisadores incluem esses efeitos para os itens positivos (Martín-Albo e cols., 2007; Wang, Siegal, Falck &…”