Transnational Corporate Social Responsibility: A Tri-Dimensional Approach to International CSR Research

By Marne L. Arthaud‐Day. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2005

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e0b28f00d4654ed82f883c1f2b0d4ea9c4142f4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: strategic and institutional approaches (2006, background): “…scholars have hypothesized that MNEs should respond to pressures for global integration and local responsiveness with respect to CSR issues just as their organizational strategies respond to pressures of integration and responsiveness in their product markets (Gnyawali, 1996; Arthaud-Day, 2005).”
Multinational corporations’ economic and human rights impacts on developing countries: a review and research agenda (2014, background): “…and motivations of their subsidiaries (e.g. Ghoshal and Bartlett, 1990; Birkinshaw et al., 1998), which has generated increased awareness that different kinds of MNCs and subsidiaries will likely have different kinds of impacts (Arthaud-Day, 2005; Marin and Bell, 2006; Narula and Driffield, 2012).”
Multinational Enterprise Subsidiaries and their CSR: A Conceptual Framework of the Management of CSR in Smaller Emerging Economies (2014, background): “This capability of local responsiveness allows MNEs to modify their organisational strategies accordingly, which in turn allows their subsidiaries to operate independently from their parent companies (Arthaud-Day 2005; Bartlett and Ghoshal 1989).”
Drivers of Global CSR Integration and Local CSR Responsiveness: Evidence from Chinese MNEs (2016, background): “…with the logic of the integration-responsiveness framework and received definitions of global CSR integration and local CSR responsiveness in line with extant research (e.g., Arthaud-Day, 2005; Filatotchev & Stahl, 2015; Husted & Allen, 2006; Miska et al., 2013; Muller, 2006; Stahl et al., 2013).”
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in South Africa (2008, background): “Not only do companies vary in their organizational cultures, but the application of business ethics (Ahmed, Chung, & Eichenseher, 2003; Blodgett, Lu, Rose, & Vitell, 2001) and the emphasis placed on CSR (Arthaud-Day, 2005; Matten & Crane, 2005; Windsor, 2004) differs across countries.”