Race Effects on the Employee Engagement-Turnover Intention Relationship
By James R. Jones, James K. Harter. 2005
140 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5dfd2ae38d3465b5de5522269ecbbee7b4212a98
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Citations in the corpus
- Moderating Role of Follower Characteristics With Transformational Leadership and Follower Work Engagement (2009, background): “Jones and Harter (2005) defined work engagement as “the individual’s involvement and satisfaction with, as well as enthusiasm for their work” (p. 80).”
- Supervisory coaching and performance feedback as mediators of the relationships between leadership styles, work engagement, and turnover intention (2018, background): “…the past decade has demonstrated a positive correlation between work engagement and the intention to leave employment (Halbesleben and Wheeler 2008; Jones and Harter 2005; Schaufeli and Bakker 2004), with this topic remaining a contemporary interest (Gabel-Shemueli et al. 2015; Tims, Bakker, and…”
- Transformational leadership and turnover (2017, background): “Furthermore, the level of engagement among the members in supervising employee dyad predicts intent to remain ( Jones and Harter, 2005).”
- Toward a Relational Theory of Employee Engagement: Understanding Authenticity, Transparency, and Employee Behaviors (2020, background): “First of all, employee engagement involves the way that employees express their selves in their role activities in the workplace (Christian et al., 2011; Jones & Harter, 2005).”
- A Tale of Passion: Linking Job Passion and Cognitive Engagement to Employee Work Performance (2011, unknown): “…broadens our understanding of the work consequence of engagement, which had previously been limited to individuals’ attitudes and perceptions (e.g., Jones & Harter, 2005) and unit-level outcomes (e.g., Harter, Schmidt, & Hayes, 2002; Salanova, Agut, & Peiro, 2005) but is now extended to a key…”