Spacing effects in memory: evidence for a two-process account
By R. Greene. 1989
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- D. Rohrer
- Marc W Howard
- Peter F Delaney
- Marina Minhui Lu
- Nate Kornell
- Michael J. Kahana
- Kelli M. Taylor
- Steve Bird
Citations in the corpus
- Structural Synaptic Plasticity Has High Memory Capacity and Can Explain Graded Amnesia, Catastrophic Forgetting, and the Spacing Effect (2014, methodology): “Last, our model is able to bridge different models, describing the spacing effect [43] on psychological [41,42,106] and molecular levels [141] by identifying structural synaptic plasticity as the potential cellular mechanism for spacing effects.”
- Application of the Testing and Spacing Effects to Name Learning (2005, background): “In his two-process theory, Greene (1989, 1990) proposed that for cued-memory tests, participants intentionally allocate rehearsal to items based on their perception of how easily the items will be remembered in the future.”
- Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of second language English syntax (2010, background): “The effect has been found under intentional and incidental learning conditions (Challis, 1993), in recognition and recall tasks (Greene, 1989), and in implicit and explicit memory tasks (e.g., Greene, 1990).”
- Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone (2008, background): “Thornton and Houser concluded that the regular messages sent by mobile phone could generate the spacing effect (c.f. Dempster 1987; Greene 1989), which facilitated vocabulary retrieval.”
- Using mobile phones in English education in Japan (2005, background): “(Greene (1989) reviews studies investigating the spacing effect.)”
- Spacing and Testing Effects: A Deeply Critical, Lengthy, and At Times Discursive Review of the Literature (2010, methodology): “Toppino and Bloom (2002), in their Experiment 1, replicated an experiment of Greene (1989) that compared free recall following incidental and intentional learning.”
- Spacing and lag effects in free recall of pure lists (2005, background): “One popular account sees subjects as devoting less attention or rehearsal to successively repeated, or massed, items (Rundus, 1971; Hintzman, 1976; Greene, 1989 ).”
- Optimising Learning Using Flashcards: Spacing Is More Effective Than Cramming (2009, background): “Another explanation of the spacing effect is diminished effort in the massed condition: People sometimes pay less attention to the second presentation of a massed item than they pay to the second presentation of a spaced item, because the massed item is already highly familiar the second time it is ”
- The effects of overlearning and distributed practise on the retention of mathematics knowledge (2006, background): “For instance, in Grote (1995), the Massers learned only on Day 1 while the Spacers’ learning continued from Day 1 through Day 22.”