Intergroup Perception in the Social Context: The Effects of Social Status and Group Membership on Perceived Out-group Homogeneity and Ethnocentrism

By Markus Brauer. 2001

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c8eb8e7b49281df53d65316d1c8686a35e28ebc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

SUBGROUP DYNAMICS IN INTERNATIONALLY DISTRIBUTED TEAMS: ETHNOCENTRISM OR CROSS-NATIONAL LEARNING? (2004, background): “Thus, while there is evidence that the decategorization and recategorization approaches can reduce ethnocentrism (for a comprehensive review, see Brewer & Gaertner, 2003), neither provide subgroups the opportunity to learn from or about each other. By contrast, Hewstone and Brown’s (1986) subcategor”
Intergroup bias. (2002, background): “To distinguish bias from a consensual description of reality, participants from a third group should also be sampled (see Brauer 2001 on separating asymmetrical intergroup biases from target-group effects).”
Multicultural and Colorblind Ideology, Stereotypes, and Ethnocentrism among Black and White Americans (2007, background): “But out-group homogeneity and ethno-centrism are also robust effects (Brauer, 2001; Mullen, Brown, & Smith, 1992).”
Finding Value in Diversity: Verification of Personal and Social Self-Views in Diverse Groups (2004, background): “…this reasoning comes from research indicating that when perceivers dislike targets who belong to other social categories , they are disinclined to make distinctions among them (e.g., Boldry & Kashy, 1999; Brauer, 2001; Judd & Park, 1988; Linville, Fischer, & Salovey, 1989; Park & Rothbart, 1982).”
Behaviour variability and the Situated Focus Theory of Power (2007, background): “These relative perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability by dominant and subordinate individuals indicate that all perceivers agree that dominant groups are more variable than subordinate groups (see Brauer, 2001; Brauer & Bourhis, 2006).”
The development of subjective group dynamics: When in-group bias gets specific (2003, result): “…theory and previous research showing that young children readily show in-group bias in minimal or transitory groups and that such bias continues into middle-childhood (Bigler, 1995; Bigler et al ., 1997, 2001; Durkin & Judge, 2001; Nesdale & Flesser, 2001; Spielman, 2000; Vaughan et al ., 1981).”