Mark Rubin

Sociology and Political Science · 2001–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 11 papers; trusts 66 researchers and is trusted by 14 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 74 citations into it; #4,176 of 22,756 by trust here, #1,401 by citations
• Social Psychology — 67 citations into it; #2,967 of 15,694 by trust here, #1,401 by citations
• Statistics and Probability — 37 citations into it
• Education — 34 citations into it; #9,177 of 11,309 by trust here, #8,671 by citations
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 13 citations into it
• Applied Psychology — 12 citations into it
• Gender Studies — 11 citations into it; #4,209 of 4,924 by trust here, #2,854 by citations
• Clinical Psychology — 10 citations into it

Whom Mark Rubin trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. A. D. Groot
2. L.
3. Mark P. Orbe
4. Ernest T. Pascarella
5. R. Feise
6. Brian A. Nosek
7. Jelle J. Goeman
8. K. Feldman
9. Monya Baker
10. John T. Jost

Who trusts Mark Rubin overall

1. John T. Jost
2. M. Verkuyten
3. Susan T. Fiske
4. Mina Cikara
5. Miles Hewstone
6. Nicole M. Stephens
7. B. David Tyler
8. Lorenz F. Goette
9. A. Batruch
10. Gordon Hodson

Papers from Mark Rubin's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Mark Rubin trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing
2. HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known
3. False-Positive Psychology (Psychology Science)
4. The Design of Experiments
5. Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice
6. The statistical crisis in science
7. First-Generation College Students
8. Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (Psychology Science)
9. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (Statistics in Medicine)
10. The (Il)legitimacy of ingroup bias - From social reality to social resistance

Their papers

• Intergroup bias. (2002) — 1,822 citations
• Social Identity, System Justification, and Social Dominance: Commentary on Reicher, Jost et al., and Sidanius et al. (2004) — 181 citations
• Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries (2014) — 271 citations
• Positive and extensive intergroup contact in the past buffers against the disproportionate impact of negative contact in the present (2014) — 181 citations
• When to adjust alpha during multiple testing: a consideration of disjunction, conjunction, and individual testing (2021) — 320 citations
• When Does HARKing Hurt? Identifying When Different Types of Undisclosed Post Hoc Hypothesizing Harm Scientific Progress (2017) — 129 citations
• Do p Values Lose Their Meaning in Exploratory Analyses? It Depends How You Define the Familywise Error Rate (2017) — 179 citations
• “I Am Working-Class” (2014) — 98 citations
• Social class differences in social integration among students in higher education: a meta-analysis and recommendations for future research. (2012) — 154 citations
• A processing fluency explanation of bias against migrants (2010) — 123 citations
• Does Multiple Categorization Reduce Intergroup Bias? (2001) — 139 citations