A supplier development program: Rational process or institutional image construction?
By K. Rogers, L. Purdy, F. Safayeni, P. R. Duimering. 2007
133 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5bf8811f0d5dca1e3bb9bbb3b525fd79e87220e3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Stephan M. Wagner
- Rui Soucasaux Sousa
- Hua-ping Chen
- Kwok Kee Wei
- T. C. Edwin Cheng
- Frank Wiengarten
- Hefu Liu
- Jibao Gu
In Strategy and Management
- Stephan M. Wagner
- C. Voss
- Rui Soucasaux Sousa
- Hua-ping Chen
- Weiling Ke
- Kwok Kee Wei
- T. C. Edwin Cheng
- Frank Wiengarten
Citations in the corpus
- Supplier development and the relationship life-cycle (2011, background): “…on supplier development were published in production- and operations management-related journals (Araz and Ozkarahan, 2007; Carr and Kaynak, 2007; Chan and Kumar, 2007; Krause et al., 2007; Lee and Humphreys, 2007; Li et al., 2007; Modi and Mabert, 2007; Rogers et al., 2007; Wouters et al., 2007).”
- The impact of contextual factors on the efficacy of ISO 9000 adoption (2013, background): “Firm labor productivity Rogers et al. (2007) suggest that suppliers with lower initial levels of productivity have relatively more room for improvement in a supplier development program.”
- Contingency research in operations management practices (2008, background): “Examined practices have included innovative manufacturing practices (Ketokivi and Schroeder, 2004b), quality management (Sila, 2007) and supplier development practices (Rogers et al., 2007).”
- The role of institutional pressures and organizational culture in the firm's intention to adopt internet‐enabled supply chain management systems (2010, background): “In the extant literature, only a few OM studies investigate the effects of institutional factors on firms’ innovation adoption (e.g., John et al., 2001; Ketokivi and Schroeder, 2004; Rogers et al., 2007; Zsidisin et al., 2005).”