Effects of task interdependence and type of communication on performance in virtual teams

By Ramón Rico, S. G. Cohen. 2005

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a451b5ffe5edb384cbcfac101f6151983e4b85f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Praveen Pinjani
2. Lucy L. Gilson
3. Prashant C. Palvia
4. Matti Vartiainen
5. M. Maynard
6. Jing Zhou
7. Christina E. Shalley
8. Alice H. Y. Hon

In Social Psychology

1. M. Maynard
2. Lucy L. Gilson
3. Prashant C. Palvia
4. Marko Hakonen
5. Matti Vartiainen
6. Nicole C. Jones Young
7. Praveen Pinjani
8. John E. Mathieu

In Strategy and Management

1. Lucy L. Gilson
2. M. Maynard

Citations in the corpus

• Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams (2013, background): “Task holds conventional teams together, while communication and collaborative technologies serve as additional bonds linking the members of a GVT [24].”
• Virtual Teams Research (2015, background): “However, a positive trend seems to be that work within this domain is starting to leverage ratings from outside the team (e.g., Andressen et al., 2012; Cummings & Hass, 2012) as well as objective measures of team performance (e.g., Rapp et al., 2010; Rico & Cohen, 2005).”