Cohesion and Performance

By François Chiocchio, Hélène Essiembre. 2009

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/599f4705453b449637e7b9253a2ab76a6d87ee5c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Won‐Woo Park
2. Sturle Danielsen Tvedt
3. Amy Kristof‐Brown
4. Yuhyung Shin
5. Doo-Seung Hong
6. J. Seong
7. Marte Pettersen Buvik

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Thomas A. O'Neill
2. Sturle Danielsen Tvedt
3. Amy Kristof‐Brown
4. Yuhyung Shin
5. S. Hastings
6. Natalie J. Allen
7. Marte Pettersen Buvik

In Social Psychology

1. Thomas A. O'Neill
2. J. Seong
3. Yuhyung Shin
4. Won‐Woo Park
5. Sturle Danielsen Tvedt
6. Amy Kristof‐Brown
7. Doo-Seung Hong
8. S. Hastings

Citations in the corpus

• Person-Group Fit (2015, background): “Meta-analytic results suggest that social cohesion is less strongly related to performance than is task cohesion, yet there is support for a weak positive relationship (Beal et al., 2003; Chiocchio & Essiembre, 2009).”
• Examining the “Pros” and “Cons” of Team Conflict: A Team-Level Meta-Analysis of Task, Relationship, and Process Conflict (2013, background): “This could be disastrous for project team performance, which is largely dependent on delivering projects on schedule and budget (Chiocchio & Essiembre, 2009).”
• The Influence of Project Commitment and Team Commitment on the Relationship between Trust and Knowledge Sharing in Project Teams (2017, background): “Cohesion is typically divided into task and social cohesion (Chiocchio & Essiembre, 2009), with task cohesion corresponding to a group’s shared commitment to the group task (Hackman, 1976) and social cohesion referring to the shared liking of and attraction to the group (Evans & Jarvis, 1980).”