Pedagogical content knowledge circa 1907 and 1987: a study in the history of an idea

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Transforming the Subject Matter: Examining the Intellectual Roots of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (2007, background): “There are broader schools of thought that have a bearing on the concept of pedagogical content knowledge in addition to that of Bruner, Schwab, and Dewey (see Bullough, 2001).”
Is Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Necessary for Reformed Science Teaching?: Evidence from an Empirical Study (2011, background): “Since the 1980s in the U.S., teacher education has faced frequent attack by politicians and policy makers concerned with the quality of teachers produced ( Bullough 2001 ).”
Influence of Content Knowledge on Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The case of teaching photosynthesis and plant growth (2009, background): “The idea of PCK has a long history (Bullough, 2001; Smith & Girod, 2003) and its content varies a lot among researchers (Hashweh, 2005; Zeidler, 2002).”
Revisiting the Conceptualisation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a Conceptual Tool to Understand Teachers as Professionals (2008, background): “…subject matter knowledge for pedagogical purposes through a process Shulman (1987) called “ transformation, ” Ball (1990) labelled “ representation, ” Veal and MaKinster (1999) termed “ translation, ” Bullough (2001) named “ professionalizing, ” and Dewey (1902/1983) entitled “ psychologizing.”