Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria
By J. Corbin, Anselm Strauss. 1990
Subfields: Social Sciences & Humanities
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Sciences & Humanities
- Jessie Brouwers
- E. D. Haan
- D. Spencer
- Popi Sotiriadou
- K. Blevins
- D. Fraser
- Dong Nguyen
- Emilio Sanchez
Citations in the corpus
- HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Models (2020, methodology): “Using a grounded theory approach (Corbin and Strauss, 1990), we identified”
- Machine Learning Operations (MLOps): Overview, Definition, and Architecture (2022, methodology): “To evaluate the interview transcripts, we use an open coding scheme [8].”
- Edible backyards: a qualitative study of household food growing and its contributions to food security (2011, unknown): “The interview transcripts and the researcher’s field notes were analyzed utilizing a grounded theory approach ( Corbin and Strauss 1990 ).”
- Interpreting Interpretability: Understanding Data Scientists' Use of Interpretability Tools for Machine Learning (2020, methodology): “Free-form responses from participants were coded via open and axial coding [10].”
- From the Vendor's Perspective: Exploring the Value Proposition in Information Technology Outsourcing (2003, unknown): “We then used causal diagrams and checklist matrices (Miles and Huberman 1984) to help us discover relationships among concepts and to do axial coding (Corbin and Strauss 1990).”
- How does visual merchandising affect consumer affective response (2012, methodology): “The research process included three phases of coding: open, axial and selective (Corbin and Strauss, 1990; Strauss, 1987; Strauss and Corbin, 1990).”
- The Interplay between Intuition and Rationality in Strategic Decision Making: A Paradox Perspective (2017, unknown): “Subsequently, she developed first-order codes for the emerging categories on the basis of their content and the language used by the informants (e.g. “gut feelings,” “translating”) (Corbin & Strauss, 1990; Gioia et al., 2013).”
- Exploring a rationale for choosing to listen to sad music when feeling sad (2013, unknown): “In a grounded theory analysis the researcher deepens an understanding of the core thematic material through this process which is ongoing from the start of data collection (Corbin & Strauss, 1990; Strauss & Corbin, 1990).”
- Portfolio Entrepreneurship in Family Firms: A Resource-based Perspective (2011, unknown): “In the next step, the two coders independently allocated the 417 pieces to the six resource categories in a spreadsheet to view data at a higher level of theoretical abstraction (Corbin and Strauss, 1990).”
- Ensuring Rigor in Qualitative Data Analysis (2018, unknown): “The creative aspect of grounded theory research is stressed by Corbin and Strauss (1990) where they claim that if the researcher simply follows the procedures without “imagination or insight into what the data are reflecting, . . . then the published findings fail.””
- Lines of Practice: A Practice-Centered Theory of Interest Relationships (2011, methodology): “!) their fit as adequately descriptive of the data (Charmaz, 2001; Corbin & Strauss, 1990; Strauss & Corbin, 1994).”
- #BlackGirlMagic: The identity conceptualization of Black women in undergraduate STEM education (2018, methodology): “After reviewing the first round of collected data in its entirety (all of the cases), open, inductive coding (Corbin & Strauss, 1990) was used to create a list of codes that described what was occurring within the data.”
- A Novice Researcher’s First Walk Through the Maze of Grounded Theory: Rationalization for Classical Grounded Theory (2013, unknown): “Corbin and Strauss (1990) put forward eleven basic procedures to follow in the development of their method as follows: 1.”
- Promoting teacher reflection: what is said to be done (2011, methodology): “The researchers did not use predefined categories in analysing a text, but used an inductive or ‘bottom up’ approach (Silverman 2001 ) comparable to grounded theory analysis (Corbin and Strauss 1990 ) in which categories emerge from the data (in the following way): 1.”
- An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data☆ (2003, background): “Depending on a researcher's general data collection and analytic framework, this phase may suggest, as in the case of, say, grounded theory, further data that ought to be collected (Charmaz & Mitchell, 2001; Corbin & Strauss, 1990).”