Regulatory focus and temporal distance

By Ginger L. Pennington, N. Roese. 2003

369 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5724adc2da97fcf31d6bd822fa2267b26c7714e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Understanding Regulatory Fit (2006, background): “For example, promotion versus prevention focus is associated with distant versus proximal temporal perspective (Pennington and Roese 2003), abstract versus concrete mental representations (Keller, Lee, and Sternthal 2004), additive versus subtractive counterfactuals (Roese, Hur, and Pennington…”
The Role of Regulatory Focus, Social Distance, and Involvement in Anti-High-Risk Drinking Advertising: A Construal-Level Theory Perspective (2015, background): “…of low-level construals (i.e., loss-framed message) as psychological distance changes (Nan 2007), and prevention-motivated concerns (i.e., concerns about the negative outcomes of an event), which constitute low-level construals, do not vary with temporal distance (Pennington and Roese 2003).”
Narcissists are approach-oriented toward their money and their friends (2009, background): “This is relevant because additional research suggests that temporal distance is positively associated with approach motivation (Mogilner, Aaker, & Pennington, 2008; Pennington & Roese, 2003).”
Emotional Brand Attachment and Brand Personality: The Relative Importance of the Actual and the Ideal Self (2011, background): “Furthermore, the regulatory focus literature suggests that promotion goals (e.g., ideal self-congruence) are perceived as more temporally removed (i.e., psychologically distant) from the present than prevention goals (Pennington and Roese 2003).”
Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: consequences for insight and creative cognition. (2004, background): “Quite recently, Pennington and Roese (2003) have adduced evidence that a distant future time perspective may increase concerns with promotion goals, whereas a near future time perspective may increase concerns with prevention goals.”
How Happiness Affects Choice (2011, neutral): “Older people tend to also be more persuaded by messages that serve emotionally meaningful goals (vs. knowledge-related goals; Fung and Carstensen 2003), and they perceive prevention goals as relatively more important than promotion goals (Pennington and Roese 2003).”
Regulatory focus as a psychological micro-foundation of leaders' exploration and exploitation activities (2015, background): “Likewise, regulatory focus seems to affect an individual’s timeframes , such that a promotion focus causes individuals to concentrate on a distant future, while prevention focus leads to near-future and retrospective thinking (Pennington & Roese, 2003; Theriault, Aaker, & Pennington, 2008).”
The influence of future time perspective on work engagement and job performance: the role of job crafting (2017, neutral): “These employees face depleting resources (e.g., in perceived time; Pennington & Roese, 2003).”
Crafting the Change: The Role of Employee Job Crafting Behaviors for Successful Organizational Change (2018, result): “This is in line with work on temporal construal (Trope & Liberman, 2003) indicating that prevention rather than promotion focused goals increase with temporal proximity of the goals (Pennington & Roese, 2003).”