The Art of Writing a Review Article

By Jeremy C. Short. 2009

328 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: History and Philosophy of Science, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54cc755fd27dd0593c1b0a8d00b85b273fedd332

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In History and Philosophy of Science

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Ethical Climates in Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda (2017, methodology): “In line with best practice (Short, 2009), the Web of Science, Google Scholar, and related databases were used to identify journal articles with “ethical climate” or “climate” in their title, keywords, or abstract that were published from 2006 to 2016.”
Psychological capital: A review and synthesis (2014, methodology): “In line with best practice (Short, 2009), we used Web of Science, Google Scholar and other”
Entrepreneurial Passion: A Review, Synthesis, and Agenda for Future Research (2019, methodology): “In line with best practice (Short, 2009), we initially searched the Web of Science and related databases for relevant peer-reviewed articles published in journals with a social science citation index.”
Best-Practice Recommendations for Producers, Evaluators, and Users of Methodological Literature Reviews (2020, background): “Taken together, these approaches to the review’s layout of recommendations are likely to increase the ease of with which substantive researchers, including doctoral students, can access the declarative and procedural knowledge included in the review (Short, 2009).”
Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021, methodology): “One such reasoning, referred to as category (f) in Table 1 and as also suggested by Short (2009), is that an earlier review of the same topic exists and that the later review excludes the coverage period of the prior review (e.g., Josefy et al., 2015; Schilke et al., 2018).”
Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A systematic review of the literature on its theoretical foundations, measurement, antecedents, and outcomes, and an agenda for future research (2019, methodology): “In line with best practice (Short, 2009), we used Web of Science, Google Scholar, and related databases to identify peer-reviewed articles with entrepreneurial self-efficacy in their title, keywords or abstract that were published from the beginning of 1998 to the end of 2017.”
The Corporate Headquarters in the Contemporary Corporation: Advancing a Multimarket Firm Perspective (2015, methodology): “To provide a complete and coherent picture of the existing knowledge about the CHQ in the multimarket firm, we followed a structured approach, using multiple techniques to search for relevant literature (Short, 2009; Webster & Watson, 2002).”
Organizational Aspirations, Reference Points, and Goals (2012, background): “It is organized according to the well-established threefold framework—antecedents, consequences, and moderators (Haleblian, Devers, McNamara, Carpenter, & Davison, 2009; Short, 2009).”
Life After Business Failure (2013, methodology): “We adopted the best practice for conducting a systematic literature review outlined by Short (2009) and deployed in recent review articles (e.g., Menz, 2012; Short, Ketchen, Shook, & Ireland, 2010).”
Crowdsourcing: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research (2018, unknown): “We have built up our argument following the guidelines set out by Davis (1971) and Short (2009).”
Reconciling and Thematizing Definitions of Mindfulness: The Big Five of Mindfulness (2016, background): “A strength of this study is its multidisciplinary literature search for definitions of mindfulness (cf. Short, 2009).”
Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks (2011, background): “Although knowledge networks research is inherently multilevel and has grown rapidly in the past decades by attracting much attention from multiple disciplines, it has not been the subject of previous review, making it an ideal topic for systematic examination (Short, 2009).”