Are Hofstede's and Schwartz's value frameworks congruent?
By Siew Imm Ng, Julie A. Lee, Geoffrey N. Soutar. 2007
271 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/53c2b905be02172e9c664c0603ad8fbae1df13ef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Liesl Riddle
- Srdan Zdravkovic
- Dirk De Clercq
- Inés López-López
- J. Munuera
- Chang Hoon Oh
- Florian von Wangenheim
- P. Fu
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Jean-Pierre Neveu
- M. Westman
- Stevan E. Hobfoll
- Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben
- P. Fu
- Dirk De Clercq
- Chang Hoon Oh
- D. Lim
In Social Psychology
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Jean-Pierre Neveu
- Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben
- M. Westman
- Wilmar B. Schaufeli
- Evangelia Demerouti
- Stevan E. Hobfoll
- Dirk De Clercq
Citations in the corpus
- Conservation of Resources in the Organizational Context: The Reality of Resources and Their Consequences (2018, background): “As such, Schwartz’s (1994) approach seems a relevant candidate (see also Ng et al. 2007).”
- Organizational Cultural Intelligence: Dynamic Capability Perspective (2010, background): “For example, when cultural distance, defined as the degree to which one nation’s culture is similar to or different from the other nation’s culture (Shenkar, 2001; Soutar et al., 2007), is perceived to be small, the role of organizational CQ is reduced compared with situations where organizational C”
- Individual–Level Resources and New Business Activity: The Contingent Role of Institutional Context (2013, background): “…rather than empirically derived, are not limited to data from one particular company, are more recent and more comprehensive, and include a more diverse set of countries (Magnusson, Wilson, Zdravkovic, Zhou, & Westjohn, 2008; Ng et al., 2007)—Schwartz’s value dimensions have limitations, too.”
- An institutional approach to cross-national distance (2010, methodology): “…has the advantages of deriving the values from theory, offering a more comprehensive set of dimensions, being based on two matched samples of more diverse and representative populations (students and teachers), and being based on data collected more recently, from 1988 to 1992 (Ng et al., 2007).”
- A Twenty-First Century Assessment of Values Across the Global Workforce (2011, background): “…in moral inclusiveness (Schwartz 2007), corporate governance (Licht et al. 2005), democratization and social attitudes (Schwartz 2006), work ideologies (Schwartz 1999), allocation of rewards in organizations (Fischer et al. 2007), and cultural distance in international trade (Ng et al. 2007).”
- Acculturative Stress or Resilience? A Longitudinal Multilevel Analysis of Sojourners’ Stress and Self-Esteem (2013, background): “Similarly, Ng, Lee, and Soutar (2006) proposed to use a cultural distance score based on the cultural values of Schwartz (1992).”
- Breaking Through the Cultural Clutter: A Comparative Assessment of Multiple Cultural and Institutional Frameworks (2008, methodology): “, 2006; Shenkar, 2001), and other researchers have sought alternative measures to capture differences between home and host markets (Drogendijk and Slangen, 2006; Gaur et al., 2006; Ng et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2004).”
- Organic food consumption in Europe: International segmentation based on value system differences (2011, methodology): “They have been widely used in cross-cultural research (Magnusson et al., 2008; Ng et al., 2007; Shenkar, 2001).”