Participant Orientations in German Conversation‐for‐Learning

By G. Kasper. 2004

263 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/530d3ef3291d06f18ba431cd04b4905fa89396ba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Yuri Hosoda
2. J. Hall
3. Numa Markee
4. John Hellermann
5. Hansun Zhang Waring
6. Olcay Sert
7. Steve Walsh
8. Jenefer Philp

Citations in the corpus

• Redressing the Roles of Correction and Repair in Research on Second and Foreign Language Learning. (2007, background): “noticeable increase in such interest (e.g., Buckwalter, 2001; Hamilton, 2004; He, 2004; Jung, 1999; Kasper, 2004; Koshik, 2002; Liebscher & DaileyO'Cain, 2003; Markee, 2000, 2004; Mori, 2002, 2004; Seedhouse, 1999, 2004; Shonerd, 1994; Smartt & Scudder, 2004).”
• Toward a Learning Behavior Tracking Methodology for CA-for-SLA (2007, methodology): “In contrast, CA-for-SLA is based on radically emic—or participant-relevant— accounts of social action (Markee and Kasper 2004), in which the theory-first, empirical analysis-second approach to knowledge construction is reversed.”
• Repair and Relevance of Differential Language Expertise in Second Language Conversations (2006, background): “In that sense, CA treats differential language expertise from a radically emic perspective (Markee and Kasper 2004).”