Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: a meta-analysis.

By A. Konrad, J. Ritchie, Pamela Lieb, Elizabeth A. Corrigall. Psychological bulletin, 2000

669 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/501d9df9b38ded2bc22c4d13a38fd3352268a8db

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Work Values, Gender, and Expectations About Work Commitment and Pay: Laying the Groundwork for the “Motherhood Penalty”? (2009, methodology): “One meta-analysis of studies of job attribute preferences found men providing stronger endorsements of such attributes as earnings, leadership opportunities, promotion opportunities, power and influence and women higher on such attributes as working with people, opportunity to help others, and feeli”
How Nice of Us and How Dumb of Me: The Effect of Exposure to Benevolent Sexism on Women’s Task and Relational Self-Descriptions (2010, background): “Prior research showed that men place more value in earnings, power, and leadership than women do, and this has been seen as an important factor causing women to opt out of the work force, or of high status positions in organizations ( Konrad et al. 2000 ).”
Effects of role models and gender on students’ entrepreneurial intentions (2014, background): “…EI (Díaz-García and Jiménez-Moreno, 2010) and the results of studies in other fields (such as information technology) (Grogan, Bell, and Conner, 1997; Konrad et al., 2000; Venkatesh et al., 2000; Morris & Venkatesh, 2000) support the gender differences found for the prediction of EI observed here.”
The Contemporary Career: A Work–Home Perspective (2014, background): “…opportunities just asmanymen do (Stroh et al. 1996), women tend to value objective status in their careers less than men do, placing more emphasis on such socioemotional factors as helping others and working with supportive and friendly coworkers (Eddleston et al. 2006, Konrad et al. 2000).”
Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines (2016, neutral): “One potential problem with this stereotype is that women, on average, value working with others and contributing to society (from here on called communal goals) more than men value these goals [116,117].”
Attitudinal and behavioral consequences of work‐family conflict and family‐work conflict (2008, background): “Furthermore, as a testament to the context-specific changes taking place in role expectations for men and women, women nowadays value certain masculine-stereotyped job attributes as highly or more highly than men ( Konrad et al. , 2000”
Parental role models and the decision to become self-employed: The moderating effect of personality (2012, background): “…for each sex) and gender stereotypes (shared beliefs about what psychological traits are appropriate for each sex) from their social environment (Deaux and Kite 1993; Eddleston et al. 2006; Konrad et al. 2000), which in turn influences their decision policies in later life (Ruble and Martin 1998).”
The Role of Masculinity/Femininity, Values, and Occupational Value Affordances in Shaping Young Men’s and Women’s Occupational Choices (2011, background): “Gender differences in occupational values have been well documented on many different value dimensions (see Konrad et al. 2000 for a meta-analysis).”