Reading Comprehension Instruction for Students With Learning Disabilities, 1995—2006: A Meta-Analysis
By Sheri Berkeley, T. Scruggs, Margo Mastropieri. 2010
223 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Safety Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4fef2e10549f141ffacf53e5ddc4d8eaedb5869b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Safety Research
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Making the right connections: Differential effects of reading intervention for subgroups of comprehenders (2012, unknown): “Recent research syntheses (e.g., Berkeley et al., 2010; Gersten et al., 2001; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2000)pointtoawidearrayofinterventionsthathaveimprovedcompre-hension outcomes for struggling readers.”
- Evaluating Reading and Mathematics Instruction for Students With Learning Disabilities (2015, background): “Fifth, comprehension strategy instruction (i.e., summarization, question generation, self-monitoring) was rarely reported despite the prevalence of comprehension difficulties for students with LD (Jitendra & Gajria, 2011).”
- The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading (2021, background): “There is an extensive body of scientific research showing that teaching comprehension strategies improves reading, even in young students, in students with learning disabilities, and in whole-class formats (e.g., Berkeley, Scruggs, & Mastropieri, 2010; Okkinga et al., 2018; Shanahan et al., 2010).”