Beyond resources: Formal models of complexity effects and age differences in working memory
By Klaus Oberauer, Reinhold Kliegl. 2001
129 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d465e1c20f1bca9973f1198bdef314bfde363ac
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Eduardo Salas
- M. Smith
- Klaus Oberauer
- Kurt Kraiger
- John Truscott
- D. Follmer
- Kyle Lewis
- Bradley R. Postle
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Eduardo Salas
- M. Smith
- Klaus Oberauer
- John Truscott
- Bradley R. Postle
- Laura Hein
- Mark D'Esposito
- D. Follmer
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Eduardo Salas
- M. Smith
- Klaus Oberauer
- Kurt Kraiger
- John Truscott
- D. Follmer
- Adam Chuderski
- E. Peters
Citations in the corpus
- Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. (2002, background): “The capacity limit of working memory probably arises from two factors, partial overwriting of representations in working memory and crosstalk between the elements in the region of direct access when one of them must be selected for processing (Oberauer & Kliegl, 2001).”
- The Science of Training and Development in Organizations (2012, background): “In addition, older learners may struggle to coordinate and integrate different sources of information (Mayr & Kliegl, 1993); thus, the performance gap between older and younger learners increases with more complex tasks (Oberauer & Kliegl, 2001).”
- Design for a working memory. (2009, background): “The increasing degree of retrieval competition, however, cannot alone explain the steep decline of performance as the load on the DA region increases (Oberauer & Kliegl, 2001).”
- Acquisition by processing: A modular perspective on language development (2004, background): “Oberauer and Kliegl, 2001) suggests that differences in working memory are not going to support the differences in children and adult grammars in second language acquisition.”