Are Individual-Level and Country-Level Value Structures Different? Testing Hofstede’s Legacy With the Schwartz Value Survey

By Ronald Fischer, C. Vauclair, Johnny Fontaine, Shalom H. Schwartz. 2010

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4cd112ea3aa163a825edcc580657a98a7652cb67

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. P. Fu
2. Olivier Furrer
3. Marina Dabic
4. Dirk T. Tempelaar
5. Mahfooz A. Ansari
6. E. Reynaud
7. A. Pekerti
8. Yongjuan Li

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Liesl Riddle
2. Olivier Furrer
3. W. Danis
4. M. Thai
5. Marina Dabic
6. Dirk T. Tempelaar
7. Mahfooz A. Ansari
8. Ekaterina Turkina

Citations in the corpus

• A Twenty-First Century Assessment of Values Across the Global Workforce (2011, methodology): “Schwartz and colleagues (Schwartz 1994a, 1999, 2006; Fischer et al. 2010) have consistently found support for his Table 1 continued”
• The role of cultural dimensions of international and Dutch students on academic and social integration and academic performance in the Netherlands (2013, background): “Furthermore, recent findings indicate that alternative conceptualisation of cultural dimensions, such as the Schwartz Value Survey (Fischer, Vauclair, Fontaine, & Schwartz, 2010), may provide alternative insights beyond Hofstede’s cultural dimensions.”
• Macro-level determinants of formal entrepreneurship versus informal entrepreneurship (2014, background): “Second, there is a substantial similarity in structure across levels between Schwartz's and Hofstede's data (Fischer et al., 2010).”